Draft:Pragmatics/Quiz

Pragmatics is a stand-alone lecture, an outgrowth of the dominant group original research project. It has been included in the course elements of terminology and may one day be a course of its own. Please feel free to help with each.

Try this quiz to see if your native knowledge is already top-of-the-line or better. You are free to take this quiz at any time and as many times as you wish. It is part of Wikiversity's dedication to learning by doing.

To improve your scores, read and study the lecture, the links contained within, listed under See also, External links, and in the template. This should give you adequate background to get 100 %.

As a "learning by doing" resource, this quiz helps you to assess your knowledge and understanding of the information, and it is a quiz you may take over and over as a learning resource to improve your knowledge, understanding, test-taking skills, and your score.

Suggestion: Have the lecture available in a separate window.

To master the information and use only your memory while taking the quiz, try rewriting the information from more familiar points of view, or be creative with association.

Enjoy learning by doing!

Quiz
{Complete the text: A short or { incomplete (i) } realization of a certain { method (i) } or idea to { demonstrate (i) } a treament's feasibility for pragmatics is called a proof of { concept (i) }.
 * type="{}"}

{ Yes or No, The relation between a linguistic expression and its expresser is a part of pragmatics. + Yes - No
 * type=""}

{ An apparent sign that may be an expression of a thought is a? { gesture|apparent gesture (i) }
 * type="{}"}

{True or False, A dominant group for pragmatics differs from a control group in that it rules the treatment of the control group. + TRUE - FALSE
 * type=""}

{ Which of the following is likely to be in a control group for assessing a pragmatics? + one or more relations + an accepted set of formats for signs - a liquid nitrogen dewar + an active speaker - a possible artifact + a wide temperature range for respondent stability
 * type="[]"}

{True or False, Pure pragmatics involves no doing apart from itself. + TRUE - FALSE
 * type=""}

{Evidence that demonstrates that a model or idea for pragmatics versus a control group is feasible is called a { proof of concept (i) }.
 * type="{}"}

{ Yes or No, You are in the middle of an open field of beautifully colored, pleasantly smelling, edible wildflowers. You've just picked one and are now munching on it. You feel you are being watched. You gesture a universal sign of "I won't hurt you, unless you try to hurt me." while turning around. Is pragmatics involved in your situation? - No + Yes
 * type=""}

{Complete the text: A proof-of-concept structure of pragmatics, including a control group, consists of { background (i) }, procedures, findings, and { interpretation (i) }.
 * type="{}"}

{True or False, A control group may be used for pragmatics to demonstrate no effect or a standard effect versus a novel effort applied to a treatment group. + TRUE - FALSE
 * type=""}

{ Complete the text: Pragmatics is an approach to { description (i) }.
 * type="{}"}

{True or False, The purpose of a treatment group for pragmatics is to describe natural processes or phenomena for the first time relative to a control group. + TRUE - FALSE
 * type=""}

Hypotheses

 * 1) Even without understanding the vocabulary, the context of the symbols provides information.