Draft talk:Analytical chemistry

Draft's Design
The way this draft has been written was inspired by simple, but educative Fridtjof Nansen's description of significant things in his book Through Siberia. For example: "On the shore lay a canoe, hollowed out of a treetrunk; but as the tree had probably not been big enough the canoe was raised with a board on each side, which was fastened with treenails. The first cripple with the bandage on his head offered at once to go out in the canoe, so that we saw how they rowed them. What we saw here in this little canoe may have been just the way in which men learned to build large boats and ships." Tosha Langue (discuss • contribs) 15:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC) Tosha Langue (discuss • contribs) 15:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, sometimes it is more important to know how people have got to a certain state of a subject, than to know about specific details of the subject. However there is an opinion that students coming to a first lecture wait something special from it. Mostly, they want to see a style of a new lector, and features of a subject he or she teaches. And when those lectors start to tell a history of their subject, mentioning the name of great scientists of past, they (lectors) forget that a student who has not studied the subject thoroughly can hardly (or unable) to esteem a contribution of those scientists. Feelings that students would experience at the first lecture will define their relation to the subject and the lector. Tosha Langue (discuss • contribs) 16:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thus, here and there, you can input definitions of specific subjects, like analytical chemistry, reference standard, and so on, so that students could write them down. Tosha Langue (discuss • contribs) 07:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC)