Instructional design/ARCS Evaluation

Rubrics
Once you complete the final task, please refer to the rubric below for quality assurance. You need to score at least 75% (3 out of 4) or higher in order to pass.

Reference
Clark, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collin.

Fleming, N. (2001). VARK: A guide to learning styles. Retrieved from

http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (2001). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (1998). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Willingham, D. T. (2005). Do visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners need visual, auditory, and kinesthetic instruction? American Educator, 29(2), 31-35.

Wlodkowski, R. J. (1985). Enhancing adult motivation to learn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.