Instructional design/WBT risks/The Risk Plan

Instructional Design: Homepage > Identifying WBT Risks >  Risky Business >  Step 1: Identify >  Your Turn - Risk Identification >  Step 2: Prioritize >  Your Turn - Risk Prioritization >  Step 3: Mitigate >  Your Turn - Risk Mitigation > The Risk Plan >  Lesson Conclusion

How Did You Do?
Compare your risk plan with the expert example below to see how you did. Don't worry too much if your three highest-priority risks don't match the example exactly. Risk planning is somewhat subjective and your past experience will naturally influence the decisions you make. For example, your organization might shuffle resources around constantly, so you decided to give the third risk a higher probability ranking. As long as you can justify your rankings with rationale arguments and you've identified effective mitigation strategies, your risk plan will take you a huge step closer to a successful WBT delivery.

Risk plan for project:    USDA Performance Management Course

Assessment team members:  David, Lisa, James, and Technical Lead

Justification for Probability and Impact Rankings
Here is the rationale that was used to determine the probability and impact rankings in the expert example.


 * "Final courseware does not function correctly in client’s LMS" is the highest-priority risk because the probability is very likely (the team has never developed courseware for the client's LMS and there may be unknown conformance issues) and the impact is very high (the courseware is useless to the client if it doesn't function in the LMS).
 * "Final courseware does not pass client’s Section 508 compliance testing" is a high-priority risk because the probability is likely (there is variation in the way these standards are interpreted) and the impact is high (the client must comply with these standards, so this could delay their training roll-out plans).
 * "Multimedia Developer is pulled onto another project" is a moderate risk because the probability is only possible (the chances of winning the mobile learning proposal are slim) although the impact is very high (the Multimedia Developer is the only team member who can do audio recording and editing).
 * "Course development software is buggy" is a moderate risk because the probability is only possible (the team is using a reputable course authoring tool) and the impact is moderate (while all tools have some bugs, the most serious ones should have been resolved by release 5.5).
 * "Technical Lead has minimal experience in project management" is a moderate risk because although the probability of this affecting the project is unlikely (the Technical Lead is capable and can seek guidance from the Training Director), the impact is high (the Technical Lead ensures that the project is delivered on time, on budget, and within scope).
 * "Client does not provide ILT materials on time" is a low-priority risk because the probability is very unlikely (the materials exist) and the impact is moderate (the team can probably develop a course prototype without the ILT materials although storyboard development might be delayed).
 * "SME is not available when needed" is the lowest-priority risk because the probability is very unlikely (the SME has bandwidth) and the impact is very low (the client can always step in if the SME is unavailable).

Click Next to continue.