Not one

Not one, is just the starting point for qm-theory or quantum m-theory. It is more important that the likelihood is maximized for its parameterspace then all of the multiplication of the probabilities equaling one or a unified unity in physics. Except that the sum of all of the probabilities should be one. So it should be called a Not just one theory. The key to qm-theory is that there is a hierachy in life that the universe holds to. Thus at the boundary of our universe is the bounding living universal decay or the limit of life on the largest scale. It is proposed that in qm-theory this limit is the last boundary of information that contains our universe. Limit boundary is the mathematical foundation that is in question in not one due to likelihood of our universe. As you multiply probabilities once you have included all of them the likelihood quickly becomes an enourmous fraction. You loose precision in taking the logarithm of this function but you begin to use the quantum trick to formulate the dynamics of the universe this way. Call this the quantum trick. There is a situation inside of the likelihood of the universe where one becomes a huge problem. If you take the ratio of the likelihoods that are maximized there is a situation were the ratio becomes one. Taking the log of one is zero. That is why in qm-theory it is called not one. What is the universal correspondence to not one? It is definetly something to find because equally likely means that there is a way to derive agreement in a deterministic way. When ratios of likelihoods are approaching not one what is the dynamics. The whole apparatus of not one was discussed inorder to create a quantum computer. If there is some relationship physically that causes a one to one relationship between likelihoods then a physical calculator can be made to represent other likelihoods. So for instance the quantum computer calculates a high precision likelihood using some form of temperature increment this value once extracted should be able to tell you the answer to any one two one or some realtive relationship it's likelihood. Meaning things that would share the same likelihood. Thus you could calculate a likelihood of some other origin like from a factorialization.

By Dennis William Melton