OToPS/Poster Rubric

Rubric for evaluating presentations
These are more detailed explanations of the scoring rubric for evaluating a poster or similar presentation, along with the supporting information.

Format type
What format of presentation is it? Traditional posters look like this. The 2.0 version looks like this. A "visual abstract" is a third approach that some journals are experimenting with now. Poster Format: New ("2.0") or Traditional (1)

Required elements
These are things that every poster should have.

Bonus points
These are more advanced analyses or models, not typical for undergraduate projects.

Penalty points
These are mistakes that you want to avoid with your presentation.

Meta-data
This is supporting material, technically not part of the poster itself.

MAGIC
Use Abelson's "MAGIC" principles to evaluate the project.

Other notes
More stuff here.