PlanetPhysics/Quantum Operator Algebras

\newcommand{\sqdiagram}[9]{$$ \diagram #1 \rto^{#2} \dto_{#4}&

\eqno{\mbox{#9}}$$ }

Quantum operator algebras(QOA)
in quantum field theories are defined as the algebras of observable operators, and as such, they are also related to the von Neumann algebra; quantum operators are usually defined on Hilbert spaces, or in some QFTs on Hilbert space bundles or other similar families of spaces.

Note: representations of Banach *-algebras, that are also defined on Hilbert spaces, are related to $$C^*$$-algebra representations which provide a useful approach to defining quantum space-times.

Quantum Operator Algebras in Quantum Field Theories: \htmladdnormallink{QOAs {http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QAT.html} in QFTs} Examples of quantum operators are: the Hamiltonian operator (or Schr\"odinger operator), the position and momentum operators, Casimir operators, Unitary operators, spin operators, and so on. The observable operators are also self-adjoint . More general operators were recently defined, such as Progogine's superoperators. Another development in quantum theories is the introduction of Frech\'et nuclear spaces or `rigged' Hilbert spaces (Hilbert bundles ). The following sections define several types of quantum operator algebras that provide the foundation of modern quantum field theories in mathematical physics.

Quantum Groups, Quantum Operator Algebras and Related Symmetries.
Quantum theories adopted a new lease of life post 1955 when von Neumann beautifully re-formulated quantum mechanics (QM) and Quantum theories (QT) in the mathematically rigorous context of Hilbert spaces and operator algebras defined over such spaces. From a current physics perspective, von Neumann' s approach to quantum mechanics has however done much more: it has not only paved the way to expanding the role of symmetry in physics, as for example with the Wigner-Eckhart theorem and its applications, but also revealed the fundamental importance in Quantum physics of the state space geometry of quantum operator algebras- Mathematical definitions

Definitions:


 * 1) Von Neumann Algebra


 * 1) Hopf Algebra


 * 1) Groupoids

.
 * 1) Haar \htmladdnormallink{systems {http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/SimilarityAndAnalogousSystemsDynamicAdjointnessAndTopologicalEquivalence.html} associated to Measured Groupoids or Locally Compact Groupoids.}

Von Neumann Algebra
Let $$\mathbb{H}$$ denote a complex (separable) Hilbert space. A \emph{von Neumann algebra} $$\A$$ acting on $$\mathbb{H}$$ is a subset of the algebra of all bounded operators $$\cL(\mathbb{H})$$ such that:

adjoint of an element $$T$$ denoted by $$T^*$$).
 * 1) (i) $$\A$$ is closed under the adjoint operation (with the


 * 1) (ii) $$\A$$ equals its bicommutant, namely:

$$ \A= \{A \in \cL(\mathbb{H}) : \forall B \in \cL(\mathbb{H}), \forall C\in \A,~ (BC=CB)\Rightarrow (AB=BA)\}~. $$

If one calls a commutant of a set $$\A$$ the special set of bounded operators on $$\cL(\mathbb{H})$$ which commute with all elements in $$\A$$, then this second condition implies that the commutant of the commutant of $$\A$$ is again the set $$\A$$.

\med On the other hand, a von Neumann algebra $$\A$$ inherits a unital subalgebra from $$\cL(\mathbb{H})$$, and according to the first condition in its definition $$\A$$ does indeed inherit a *-subalgebra structure, as further explained in the next section on C*-algebras. Furthermore, we have notable Bicommutant Theorem which states that $$\A$$ \emph{is a von Neumann algebra if and only if $$\A$$ is a *-subalgebra of $$\cL(\mathbb{H})$$, closed for the smallest topology defined by continuous maps $$(\xi,\eta)\longmapsto (A\xi,\eta)$$ for all $$$$ where $$<.,.>$$ denotes the inner product defined on $$\mathbb{H}$$}~. For a well-presented treatment of the geometry of the state spaces of quantum operator algebras, see e.g. Aflsen and Schultz (2003).

Hopf algebra
First, a unital associative algebra consists of a linear space $$A$$ together with two linear maps

$$ m &: A \otimes A \lra A~,~(multiplication) \\ \eta &: \bC \lra A~,~ (unity)

$$ satisfying the conditions $$

m(m \otimes \mathbf 1) &= m (\mathbf 1 \otimes m) \\ m(\mathbf 1 \otimes \eta) &= m (\eta \otimes \mathbf 1) = \ID~.

$$ This first condition can be seen in terms of a commuting diagram~: $$ \begin{CD} A \otimes A \otimes A @> m \otimes \ID>> A \otimes A \\ @V \ID \otimes mVV @VV m V \\ A \otimes A @ > m >> A \end{CD} $$ Next suppose we consider `reversing the arrows', and take an algebra $$A$$ equipped with a linear homorphisms $$\Delta : A \lra A \otimes Aa,b \in A$$ :

$$ \Delta(ab) &= \Delta(a) \Delta(b) \\ (\Delta \otimes \ID) \Delta &= (\ID \otimes \Delta) \Delta~.

$$

We call $$\Delta$$ a comultiplication, which is said to be coasociative in so far that the following diagram commutes $$ \begin{CD} A \otimes A \otimes A @< \Delta\otimes \ID<< A \otimes A \\ @A \ID \otimes \Delta AA @AA \Delta A \\ A \otimes A @ < \Delta << A \end{CD} $$

There is also a counterpart to $$\eta$$, the counity map $$\vep : A \lra \bC$$ satisfying $$ (\ID \otimes \vep) \circ \Delta = (\vep \otimes \ID) \circ \Delta = \ID~. $$ A bialgebra $$(A, m, \Delta, \eta, \vep)Awith mapsm, \Delta, \eta, \vep$$ satisfying the above properties.

\med Now to recover anything resembling a group structure, we must append such a bialgebra with an antihomomorphism $$S : A \lra A$$, satisfying $$S(ab) = S(b) S(a)$$, for $$a,b \in A$$~. This map is defined implicitly via the property~: $$ m(S \otimes \ID) \circ \Delta = m(\ID \otimes S) \circ \Delta = \eta \circ \vep. $$ We call $$S$$ the antipode map. A Hopf algebra is then a bialgebra $$(A,m, \eta, \Delta, \vep)$$ equipped with an antipode map $$S$$~.

\med Commutative and noncommutative Hopf algebras form the backbone of quantum `groups' and are essential to the generalizations of symmetry. Indeed, in most respects a quantum `group' is identifiable with a Hopf algebra. When such algebras are actually associated with proper groups of matrices there is considerable scope for their representations on both finite and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces.

Groupoids
Recall that a groupoid $$\grp$$ is, loosely speaking, a small category with inverses over its set of objects $$X = Ob(\grp)$$~. One often writes $$\grp^y_x$$ for the set of morphisms in $$\grp$$ from $$x$$ to $$y$$~. A topological groupoid consists of a space $$\grp$$, a distinguished subspace $$\grp^{(0)} = \obg \subset \grp$$, called {\it the space of objects} of $$\grp$$, together with maps $$ r,s~:~ \xymatrix{ \grp \ar@ [r]^r \ar[r]_s & \grp^{(0)} } $$ called the {\it range} and {\it source maps} respectively, together with a law of composition $$ \circ~:~ \grp^{(2)}: = \grp \times_{\grp^{(0)}} \grp = \{ ~(\gamma_1, \gamma_2) \in \grp \times \grp ~:~ s(\gamma_1) = r(\gamma_2)~ \}~ \lra ~\grp~, $$ such that the following hold~:~

\item[(1)] $$s(\gamma_1 \circ \gamma_2) = r(\gamma_2)~,~ r(\gamma_1 \circ \gamma_2) = r(\gamma_1)~, for all(\gamma_1, \gamma_2) \in \grp^{(2)}$$~.

\med \item[(2)] $$s(x) = r(x) = x$$~, for all $$x \in \grp^{(0)}$$~.

\med \item[(3)] $$\gamma \circ s(\gamma) = \gamma~,~ r(\gamma) \circ \gamma = \gamma~, for all\gamma \in \grp$$~.

\med \item[(4)] $$(\gamma_1 \circ \gamma_2) \circ \gamma_3 = \gamma_1 \circ (\gamma_2 \circ \gamma_3)$$~.

\med \item[(5)] Each $$\gamma$$ has a two--sided inverse $$\gamma^{-1}$$ with $$\gamma \gamma^{-1} = r(\gamma)~,~ \gamma^{-1} \gamma = s (\gamma)$$~. Furthermore, only for topological groupoids the inverse map needs be continuous. \med It is usual to call $$\grp^{(0)} = Ob(\grp)$$ {\it the set of objects} of $$\grp$$~. For $$u \in Ob(\grp)$$, the set of arrows $$u \lra u$$ forms a group $$\grp_u$$, called the isotropy group of $$\grp$$ at $$u$$.

\med Thus, as is well kown, a topological groupoid is just a groupoid internal to the category of topological spaces and continuous maps. The notion of internal groupoid has proved significant in a number of fields, since groupoids generalise bundles of groups, group actions, and equivalence relations. For a further study of groupoids we refer the reader to Brown (2006). \med

$$>>$$ Several examples of groupoids are: (a) locally compact groups, transformation groups, and any group in general (e.g. [59] (b) equivalence relations (c) tangent bundles (d) the tangent groupoid (e.g. [4]) (e) holonomy groupoids for foliations (e.g. [4]) (f) Poisson groupoids (e.g. [81]) (g) graph groupoids (e.g. [47, 64]).

\med As a simple, helpful example of a groupoid, consider (b) above. Thus, let R be an equivalence relation on a set X. Then R  is a groupoid under the following operations: $$(x, y)(y, z) = (x, z), (x, y)^{-1} = (y, x)$$. Here, $$\grp^0 = X $$, (the diagonal of $$X \times X$$ ) and $$r((x, y)) = x, s((x, y)) = y$$. \med So $$ R^2$$ = $$\left\{((x, y), (y, z)) : (x, y), (y, z) \in R \right\} $$. When $$R = X \times X $$, R is called a trivial  groupoid. A special case of a trivial groupoid is $$R = R_n = \left\{ 1, 2,. . ., n \right\}$$ $$\times $$ $$\left\{ 1, 2,. . ., n \right\} $$. (So every i is equivalent to every j ). Identify $$(i,j) \in R_n$$ with the matrix unit $$e_{ij}$$. Then the groupoid $$R_n$$ is just matrix multiplication except that we only multiply $$e_{ij}, e_{kl}$$ when $$k = j$$, and $$(e_{ij} )^{-1} = e_{ji}$$. We do not really lose anything by restricting the multiplication, since the pairs $$e_{ij}, {e_{kl}}$$ excluded from groupoid multiplication just give the 0 product in normal algebra anyway. For a groupoid $$\grp_{lc}$$ to be a locally compact groupoid means that $$\grp_{lc}$$ is required to be a (second countable) locally compact Hausdorff space, and the product and also inversion maps are required to be continuous. Each $$\grp_{lc}^u$$ as well as the unit space $$\grp_{lc}^0$$ is closed in $$\grp_{lc}$$. What replaces the left Haar measure on $$\grp_{lc}$$ is a system of measures $$\lambda^u$$ ($$u \in \grp_{lc}^0$$), where $$\lambda^u$$ is a positive regular Borel measure on $$\grp_{lc}^u$$ with dense support. In addition, the $$\lambda^u$$ \^a~@~Ys are required to vary continuously (when integrated against $$f \in C_c(\grp_{lc}))$$ and to form an invariant family in the sense that for each x, the map $$y \mapsto xy$$ is a measure preserving homeomorphism from $$\grp_{lc}^s(x)$$ onto $$\grp_{lc}^r(x)$$. Such a system $$\left\{ \lambda^u \right\}$$ is called a left Haar system for the locally compact groupoid $$\grp_{lc}$$. \med

This is defined more precisely next.

Haar systems for locally compact topological groupoids
Let $$ \xymatrix{ \grp \ar@ [r]^r \ar[r]_s & \grp^{(0)}}=X $$ be a locally compact, locally trivial topological groupoid with its transposition into transitive (connected) components. Recall that for $$x \in X$$, the costar of $$x$$ denoted $$\rm{CO}^*(x)$$ is defined as the closed set $$\bigcup\{ \grp(y,x) : y \in \grp \}$$, whereby $$ \grp(x_0, y_0) \hookrightarrow \rm{CO}^*(x) \lra X~, $$ is a principal $$\grp(x_0, y_0)$$--bundle relative to fixed base points $$(x_0, y_0)$$~. Assuming all relevant sets are locally compact, then following Seda (1976), a \emph{(left) Haar system on $$\grp$$} denoted $$(\grp, \tau)$$ (for later purposes), is defined to comprise of i) a measure $$\kappa$$ on $$\grp$$, ii) a measure $$\mu$$ on $$X$$ and iii) a measure $$\mu_x$$ on $$\rm{CO}^*(x)$$ such that for every Baire set $$E$$ of $$\grp$$, the following hold on setting $$E_x = E \cap \rm{CO}^*(x)$$~: \item[(1)] $$x \mapsto \mu_x(E_x)$$ is measurable.  \med \item[(2)] $$\kappa(E) = \int_x \mu_x(E_x)~d\mu_x$$ ~.  \med \item[(3)] $$\mu_z(t E_x) = \mu_x(E_x)$$, for all $$t \in \grp(x,z)$$ and $$x, z \in \grp$$~. \med

The presence of a left Haar system on $$\grp_{lc}$$ has important topological implications: it requires that the range map $$r : \grp_{lc} \rightarrow \grp_{lc}^0\grp_{lc}$$ with a left Haar system, the vector space $$C_c(\grp_{lc})$$ is a convolution *--algebra, where for $$f, g \in C_c(\grp_{lc})$$: \\ \med $$f * g(x) = \int f(t)g(t^{-1} x) d \lambda^{r(x)} (t)$$, with f*(x) $$ = \overline{f(x^{-1})}$$. \med One has $$C^*(\grp_{lc})$$ to be the enveloping C*--algebra of $$C_c(\grp_{lc})$$ (and also representations are required to be continuous in the inductive limit topology). Equivalently, it is the completion of $$\pi_{univ}(C_c(\grp_{lc}))$$ where $$\pi_{univ}$$ is the universal representation of $$\grp_{lc}$$. For example, if $$ \grp_{lc} = R_n$$, then $$C^*(\grp_{lc})$$ is just the finite dimensional algebra $$C_c(\grp_{lc}) = M_n$$, the span of the $$e_{ij}$$'s.

There exists (e.g.[63, p.91]) a measurable Hilbert bundle $$(\grp_{lc}^0, \mathbb{H}, \mu)$$ with $$\mathbb{H} = \left\{ \mathbb{H}^u_{u \in \grp_{lc}^0} \right\}\H$$. Then, for every pair $$\xi, \eta$$ of square integrable sections of $$\mathbb{H}$$, it is required that the function $$x \mapsto (L(x)\xi (s(x)), \eta (r(x)))be\nu\Phi$$ of $$C_c(\grp_{lc})$$ is then given by:\\ $$\left\langle \Phi(f) \xi \vert,\eta \right\rangle = \int f(x)(L(x) \xi (s(x)), \eta (r(x))) d \nu_0(x)$$.

The triple $$(\mu, \mathbb{H}, L)$$ is called a \textit{measurable $$\grp_{lc}$$--Hilbert bundle}.