Talk:Controversies in Science/Water fluoridation

Comment
The layout for the information on this controversy appears pretty good for the most part, but in some places I think the grammar could be improved. I refer in particular to this text from the "Points against" column:

I understand that the point intended by this statement is that children exposed to high concentrations of fluoride appear to have lower IQs, on average, than those not exposed to the fluoride, but it is difficult to draw this from the sentence because of its wording. Might I suggest the following alternative format?

I have included the text of the citation in the revised statement because, from my experience copyediting Wikipedia articles during the Copyediting backlog elimination drives, it is customary to include a citation after the punctuation mark concluding a sentence, or a piece of a sentence. Wilhelmina Will 01:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Although, I'm against the idea of water fluoridation, I am left wondering how these scientists arrived at the conclusion that there are fewer people with caries in the population and how they were able to reduce the number of caries without adding fluoride to our water.