Talk:Engineering Projects/Poppit/Howard Community College/Fall2011/502 AZM


 * Problem Statement 10/10
 * Summary 0/10 ... opinion, no reference to the problem statement
 * Poster 0/10 ... no poster
 * Story 10/10 ... incrediable ... good work
 * Decision List 10/10 ...
 * Material list 10/10
 * Software List 10/10
 * Time 5/10 this is the total time in hours, spent by team members on the project, not an estimation of future time required
 * Tutorials 10/10 .. this is next step advice, not tutorial
 * Next Steps 10/10 .. this would have been good problem statement
 * 80/100 1sfoerster 12:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

If user pages were filled out, someone would have gotten 50 points for pushing the project forward. But they were not. Significant work was done here, but can not tell who did it. 1sfoerster 12:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)