Talk:Ethical Management of the English Language Wikiversity

question
I would like to know how the text in the Notes section relates to the subject of this project. At first glance it appeared to be vandalism... --mikeu talk 13:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I just noticed the redirect. Never mind.  --mikeu talk 14:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * {ec} They were notes to myself - translated:
 * Daniel Brandt Vandal Impostor
 * Good faith was assumed of a penis vandal, but not of a vested contributor. Why does the project lack strong controls to prevent vandals from creating damage?
 * Wikiversity mainly used by parties as a revenge tool
 * Meta pages used as ways to "get" opponents.
 * Thought experiment - could I create a project on "how to get away with murder/rape" and compare it to the conduct of contributors to the encyclopedia - why or why not?

However, I support the project created by CM, and have redirected this there, relinquishing the space if someone feels like developing this project. Salmon of Doubt 14:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)