Talk:Evaluating Evidence

Please course feedback here. Thanks! --Lbeaumont (discuss • contribs) 14:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Corroborating Evidence and Falsifying Evidence
Add a section that discusses the roles of Corroborating Evidence and Falsifying Evidence. Use the term Corroborating Evidence in appropriate places throughout the course. --Lbeaumont (discuss • contribs) 15:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Lee,
 * There are things that are felt and do not have any trace of physical evidence.
 * When humanity invented language they gave names to all that was in existence.Apart from the physical stuff humanity also identified the non physical things and started giving them names.
 * Those things were in existence and humanity named them.The relationships, feelings, emotions etc. As humanity wandered in the jungles there were only existential real things.
 * But as they learnt agriculture and had to settle humanity started creating situations where the absence of the feelings and emotions could be felt and realised.
 * These absence was given a name.Over centuries now humanity believes that they by themselves have an existence. Examples can be things like delusion,myth,hatred etc.
 * We can not find physical evidence either for love or hatred. We can by logical thinking evaluate that love exists and is a reality and hatred does not exist and it is just absence of love.
 * How we will include this in the syllabus of evidence is a challenge and will need some brainstorming. Coexistencial-Reality (discuss • contribs) 03:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)