Talk:Evidence-based assessment/Assessment Center/Clinician resources

2006 Summer 2023 Goals

 * Create and test assembly line for putting assessments into REDCap
 * Create a list of best free measures (starter kits) for adults * and youth on several important diagnostic domains: ADHD/ODD/CD, * Anxiety, Bipolar, Depression, Trauma/PTSD, Substance Use, SITB, Development/QoL.
 * Decide on the infrastructure (and implement) for the REDCap project that best facilitates clinician and client use: instrument selection, client tracking, feedback.
 * Create a process for evaluating, selecting, and creating translations of assessments in REDCap.

Qualtrics Version Admins
Eyoungstrom / eyoungstrom@hgaps.org Lizzie Emma Caroline V?

REDCap Version Admins
Elborde / g.perezalgorta

OSF.io Admins
Eyoungstrom / Eyoungstrom@hgaps.org

Changes to Tables

 * Formatting consistency -- no periods at end, be consistent about bullets (or no bullets), capitalization, defining acronyms and using consistent names
 * Audit:
 * Make sure that PDF link it to archive in OSF
 * Add links
 * To AC (Qualtrics, REDCap)
 * To OSF
 * Any other resources (don't delete, but clarify, not "Link here" <-- link to WHAT? :-)
 * Wikiversity page about measure
 * Wikipedia article about measure
 * Templates:
 * Like, make templates to indicate if link goes to OSF, HGAPS "Granary"/repository, Wikipedia, Wikiversity, Assessment Center....
 * Have Cody, Brei make missing ones, and
 * Record how
 * have other team deploy

Demographics
Here's a link to a 2022 Pew survey about USA attitudes towards general. Helpful getting a description of the nuanced opinions. Pew has been studying the topic for a while, so there is information about national trends here, too.

For things in the Assessment Center, it would make sense to
 * 1) Standardize
 * 2) Go with a "middle way" approach (the Pew report suggests a methodology, and tying to it would be a strong precedent)
 * 3) Make a demographics module to use consistently across projects
 * 4) Have a web page describing the rationale (again, Pew seems like a good middle ground starting point)
 * 5) Explain to participants how the information would be used, both vis them and to help other people. It's one thing if it changes scoring for the individual; it's more abstract and altruistic if it's to provide benchmarks for other people, and a third thing if its for research; the worst is the scenario where they get asked a lot of questions and nothing happens with it.

To dos:
[] Clarify when the link is to one of the Qualtrics scoring options
 * add information to both of the assessment tables
 * clean up the resources by domain
 * add more clinician eba resources

[] (and we should systematically add them all)

List of Measures to Add and Why
Petersen Pubertal Screening Device: Free, widely used in research, and we have been ignoring it as a construct in clinical psychological practice

GBI-10m, GBI-10Da, GBI-10Db, GBI sleep -- all have recently been validated in 2020 & 2021 papers, and are much more convenient than the full length version (Mood and sleep)

Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) -- requested as a process measure for treatment

'ICOHM Standard set of outcome measures'

RCADS-25 (anxiety and depression)

OCI-CV

CRIES-8/13

C-SSRS self report screener (self harm)

KIDSCREEN-10 (Quality of Life)

CGAS <-- super easy; most valuable if there were a way of tracking over time

CALIS

- Anything that looks solid that is COVID-19 related was trendy and worth adding

Also need to look at the Becker-Haimes update of the Beidas et al. 2015 "Best of the Free" -- that will be a major source of new measures

Eyoungstrom (discuss • contribs) 00:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)