Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2016/Polyamory and emotional need fulfillment

Compersion
Check out compersion. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Interesting! Thank you for that information--U3096943 (discuss • contribs) 11:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Comments
Hey Dana,

Was just having a quick read over your chapter - very informative and interesting, well done! Just noticed one thing with your referencing - You need to indent the second line of your references, so that they are "hanging". In the template that you would have originally used to get your chapter structure, their will be a little "box" in the reference section (you'll have to hover over it to see it) which already had the built in syntax so that your references are indented on the second line, so you can just add to that at they will "hang" automatically. Hannah :) --U3100481 (discuss • contribs) 00:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Heading casing
Thanks James. --U3096943 (discuss • contribs) 02:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments
Hi, Interesting topic and your page looks great so far! I have shared a couple of contemporary articles that are hopefully helpful and may provide a slightly different perspective. The first article focuses on outsiders attitudes toward polygamy and a new assessment measure for assessing attitudes. The second focuses on sexual motivation and specifically female sexual motivation to engage in same-sex behaviors. Best of luck with the rest of your chapter, can't wait to see the finished product :) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19419899.2014.1001774 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-014-0462-4--U3090066 (discuss • contribs) 18:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Dana. I think your chapter is really great! I really enjoyed the overview, which easily drew me in! I found each section logical and flowed on well to the next. I thought all your graphs and tables worked well and broke up the text. I thought the way you applied theories and model to the topic was good and you showed good critical thinking.(Something I could have improved on). I liked your images, especially at the end. I think you have done a really great job, especially in term of creating a space to reconsider preconceived ideas about polyamory. Pushed to suggest anything, maybe an image with some colour at the beginning. I was also wondering about interactive feature, (mainly because I didn't include one. and now I am kicking myself big time). The only other tiny thing is, in the overview I got tripped up a with the word "values" in the sentence starting... I had to read it a few times to see if you meant monogamous values or polyamory origins values.

Great job, I learnt a lot! Good luck Lorinda"

Structure
I suggest avoiding having only a single sub-section within a section; either add another sub-section or merge the content into the higher level section. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)