Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Resentment

Comments
Hello!

It could be a good idea to discuss what types of therapy are best for the resentment emotion. Acceptance and commitment therapy would be a great example and I have found an article for you to get more info on it http://www.leaderlabs.asia/uploads/4/7/6/2/4762488/________encyclopedia_of_cognitive_behavior_therapy_social_indicators_research_series.pdf#page=7

--Brianna Meddemmen (discuss • contribs) 09:10, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

{{METF/2021
 * 1=


 * 1) Title correct
 * 2) Sub-title incorrect - have fixed it.
 * 2=


 * 1) Created - minimal, but sufficient
 * 2) Description about self provided
 * 3) Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
 * 4) Link provided to book chapter
 * 3=


 * 1) Summarised with direct link(s) to evidence.
 * 2) 1st edit wasn't really helpful - be carefully playing around with templates (i.e., code that starts with {{ )
 * 3) 2nd edit great
 * 4=


 * 1) Good, top-level structure.
 * 2) Room for further development e.g., sub-headings
 * 3) Avoid having sections with only one sub-heading
 * 5=


 * 1) Promising plan - is well matched to the topic.
 * 2) Overview - Consider adding:
 * 3) an image
 * 4) an example or case study
 * 5) Move the references into the References section and provide APA style citations in the main text.
 * 6) Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
 * 7) Consider including more examples/case studies.
 * 8) Conclusion (the most important section):
 * 9) what might the take-home, practical messages be?
 * 10) in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question in the sub-title?
 * 6=


 * 1) Excellent
 * 2) A figure is presented.
 * 3) Caption uses APA style. Italicise Figure X. ...
 * 4) Caption explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text.
 * 5) Cite each figure at least once in the main text.
 * 7=


 * OK
 * 1) For APA referencing style, check and correct:
 * 2) capitalisation
 * 3) italicisation
 * 4) doi formatting
 * 5) Move non-academic sources into External links
 * 8=

}} -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * OK
 * 1) Use bullet-points
 * 2) Include source in brackets after link

{{MEBF/2021
 * 1=


 * 1) Overall, this chapter does a reasonably good job of applying psychological theory to an important everyday emotion. The main areas for potential improvement are to provide a more indepth review of relevant psychological research, rely less on non-academic sources, and to improve the quality of written expression.
 * 2) Addressing the topic development feedback could have helped to improve this chapter.
 * 3) Move non-peer reviewed links into the external links section.
 * 4) For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.
 * 2=


 * 1) Well developed Overview.
 * 2) Excellent case study example.
 * 3) Resentment is well described, along with related emotions.
 * 4) Clear focus question(s).
 * 5) Quality of written expression is OK, but could be improved.
 * 3=


 * 1) Relevant theory is selected, described, and explained.
 * 2) The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory.
 * 4=


 * 1) Reasonable depth is provided about the selected theory(ies).
 * 2) Many of the suggested steps for overcoming resentment appear to be plagiarised from https://www.marksichel.com/Forgiveness10StepsToLettingGoOfResentment.en.html
 * 3) Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information.
 * 4) Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. An example of someone overcoming resentment would be helpful.
 * 5) The chapter overuses non-peer-reviewed sources.
 * 5=


 * 1) Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of relevant psychological research.
 * 2) Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
 * 6=


 * 1) Critical thinking about research is insufficient.
 * 2) Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the {{fact}} tags).
 * 3) Critical thinking about research could be evidenced by:
 * 4) describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
 * 5) discussing the direction of relationships
 * 6) considering the strength of relationships
 * 7) suggesting specific directions for future research
 * 7=


 * 1) The chapter places more emphasis on theory than research.
 * 8=


 * 1) A good conclusion is provided, although it is somewhat basic.
 * 9=


 * 1) Written expression
 * 2) Overall, the quality of written expression is basic, but sufficient.
 * 3) "Individuals" is overused. "People" is often a better term than "individuals".
 * 4) Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences.
 * 5) Layout
 * 6) Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings.
 * 7) Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent.
 * 8) APA style
 * 9) Direct quotes need page numbers.
 * 10) Figures and tables
 * 11) Use APA style for Figure captions. See example.
 * 12) Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1).
 * 13) Figures are very well captioned.
 * 14) Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text.
 * 15) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example:
 * 16) Multiple citations in parentheses should be listed in alphabetical order by first author surname.
 * 17) If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either:
 * 18) in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or
 * 19) in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020)
 * 20) Do not include author first names, initials, or titles.
 * 21) Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses.


 * 1) References are not in full APA style. For example:
 * 2) Check and correct use of capitalisation
 * 3) "Retrieved from" is not used for APA style 7th ed.
 * 4) Add spaces between author initials
 * 5) Formatting of volume and issue numbers
 * 6) Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
 * 7) Include hyperlinked dois
 * 8) Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section
 * 9) etc.
 * 10=


 * 1) Overall, the use of learning features is basic.
 * 2) Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
 * 3) No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
 * 4) Basic use of image(s).
 * 5) No use of table(s).
 * 6) Very good use of feature box(es) - consider making them wider.
 * 7) Excellent use of quiz(zes).
 * 8) Excellent use of case studies or examples.
 * 9) Format bullet-points for see also and external links per Tutorial 1.
 * 11=

}} -- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC) {{MEMF/2021
 * 1) ~4 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence.
 * 1=


 * 1) Overall, this is a basic presentation.
 * 2=


 * 1) The sub-title is missing on the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
 * 2) Briefly explain why this topic is important.
 * 3) Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages.
 * 3=


 * 1) Comments about the book chapter also apply to this section.
 * 2) Ideally, use peer-reviewed sources rather than dictionaries.
 * 3) The presentation addresses the topic.
 * 4) Overall, there is too much visual content, in too much detail. Zoom out, summarise, and provide a higher-level presentation.
 * 5) The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory.
 * 6) The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research.
 * 7) The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies.
 * 8) The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.
 * 4=


 * 1) A Conclusion slide is presented with good take-home message(s).
 * 5=


 * 1) The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio.
 * 2) Basic intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement.
 * 3) The audio communication is hesitant in some places - could benefit from further practice.
 * 4) Audio recording quality was basic. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard clicks audible). Consider using an external microphone.
 * 6=


 * 1) Overall, visual display quality is basic.
 * 2) The presentation makes basic use of text-based slides.
 * 3) Some of the font size should be larger to make it easier to read.
 * 4) The amount of text presented per slide should be reduced to make it easier to read.
 * 5) The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images.
 * 6) The presentation is basically produced using simple tools.
 * 7=


 * 1) The chapter title but not the sub-title is used in the name of the presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
 * 2) A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
 * 3) Links to and from the book chapter are provided.
 * 8=

}} -- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) A copyright license for the presentation is provided.
 * 2) The source details for the image are not provided in clear or clickable format.