Talk:Organic chemistry/Naming

Merger
It looks like the page Organic chemistry/Organic naming is also covering this topic, should we consider a merger? Or should we just delete the other because it is sparse? Lukejodonnell (discuss • contribs) 03:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I would recommend merging any unduplicated content and then deleting the other. From a licensing standpoint, when we take content from a page like that, we also need to merge the edit histories.  When you're done copying the content, be sure to tag the deletion with a comment to merge history to this resource.  Thanks!  -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 12:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree per above Dave Braunschweig. Heartwarming (discuss • contribs) 01:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and merge the content, then let me know where it ends up. I'll perform the history merge to go with it.  Thanks! -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 01:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * That red notification really got my attention, thought I was in trouble haha. Alright, I merged the content! Thanks for the history merge! Heartwarming (discuss • contribs) 01:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * All set. You're doing a great job!  Thanks for contributing to Wikiversity!  -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 02:10, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem! While the material is fresh in my brain, it helps me retain information if I communicated it to an audience. Also could you merge the history for Chemical kinetics and Rates of Reaction - Kinetics? I decided to reorganize it under Chemical kinetics for simplicity. Plus the title is wonky. Heartwarming (discuss • contribs) 02:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 02:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)