Talk:PlanetPhysics/Behaviour of Measuring Rods and Clocks in Motion

Original TeX Content from PlanetPhysics Archive
%%% This file is part of PlanetPhysics snapshot of 2011-09-01 %%% Primary Title: The Behaviour of Measuring-Rods and Clocks in Motion %%% Primary Category Code: 03.30.+p %%% Filename: BehaviourOfMeasuringRodsAndClocksInMotion.tex %%% Version: 2 %%% Owner: bloftin %%% Author(s): bloftin %%% PlanetPhysics is released under the GNU Free Documentation License. %%% You should have received a file called fdl.txt along with this file. %%% If not, please write to gnu@gnu.org. \documentclass[12pt]{article} \pagestyle{empty} \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in} \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}

\setlength{\topmargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\headsep}{0.00in} \setlength{\headheight}{0.00in} \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in} \setlength{\textheight}{9.00in} \setlength{\voffset}{0.00in} \setlength{\hoffset}{0.00in} \setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.00in} \setlength{\marginparsep}{0.00in} \setlength{\parindent}{0.00in} \setlength{\parskip}{0.15in}

\usepackage{html}

% this is the default PlanetMath preamble. as your knowledge % of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but % it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files %\usepackage{psfrag} % need this for including graphics (\includegraphics) %\usepackage{graphicx} % for neatly defining theorems and propositions %\usepackage{amsthm} % making logically defined graphics %\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here

\begin{document}

\subsection{The Behaviour of Measuring-Rods and Clocks in Motion} From \htmladdnormallink{Relativity: The Special and General Theory}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/SpecialTheoryOfRelativity.html} by \htmladdnormallink{Albert Einstein}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/AlbertEinstein.html} Place a metre-rod in the $x'$-axis of $K'$ in such a manner that one end (the beginning) coincides with the point $x'=0$ whilst the other end (the end of the rod) coincides with the point $x'=I$. What is the length of the metre-rod relatively to the \htmladdnormallink{system}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/GenericityInOpenSystems.html} $K$? In order to learn this, we need only ask where the beginning of the rod and the end of the rod lie with respect to $K$ at a particular time $t$ of the system $K$. By means of the first equation of \htmladdnormallink{The Lorentz transformation}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/LorentzTransformation.html} the values of these two points at the time $t = 0$ can be shown to be

\begin{eqnarray*} x_{\mbox{(begining of rod)}} &=& 0 \overline{\sqrt{I-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \\ x_{\mbox{(end of rod)}} &=& 1 \overline{\sqrt{I-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \end{eqnarray*} ~

\noindent the distance between the points being $\sqrt{I-v^2/c^2}$.

But the metre-rod is moving with the \htmladdnormallink{velocity}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Velocity.html} v relative to K. It therefore follows that the length of a rigid metre-rod moving in the direction of its length with a velocity $v$ is $\sqrt{I-v^2/c^2}$ of a metre.

The rigid rod is thus shorter when in \htmladdnormallink{motion}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CosmologicalConstant.html} than when at rest, and the more quickly it is moving, the shorter is the rod. For the velocity $v=c$ we should have $\sqrt{I-v^2/c^2} = 0$, and for stiII greater velocities the square-root becomes imaginary. From this we conclude that in the theory of relativity the velocity $c$ plays the part of a limiting velocity, which can neither be reached nor exceeded by any real body.

Of course this feature of the velocity $c$ as a limiting velocity also clearly follows from the equations of the Lorentz transformation, for these became meaningless if we choose values of $v$ greater than $c$.

If, on the contrary, we had considered a metre-rod at rest in the $x$-axis with respect to $K$, then we should have found that the length of the rod as judged from $K'$ would have been $\sqrt{I-v^2/c^2}$; this is quite in accordance with the principle of relativity which forms the basis of our considerations.

\emph{A Priori} it is quite clear that we must be able to learn something about the physical behaviour of measuring-rods and clocks from the equations of transformation, for the \htmladdnormallink{magnitudes}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/AbsoluteMagnitude.html} $z, y, x, t$, are nothing more nor less than the results of measurements obtainable by means of measuring-rods and clocks. If we had based our considerations on the Galileian transformation we should not have obtained a contraction of the rod as a consequence of its motion.

Let us now consider a seconds-clock which is permanently situated at the origin ($x'=0$) of $K'$. $t'=0$ and $t'=I$ are two successive ticks of this clock. The first and fourth equations of the Lorentz transformation give for these two ticks:

$$t = 0$$

\noindent and

$$t' = \frac{I}{\sqrt{I-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$ ~

As judged from $K$, the clock is moving with the velocity $v$; as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses between two strokes of the clock is not one second, but

$$\frac{I}{\sqrt{I-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$ ~

\noindent seconds, {\it i.e.} a somewhat larger time. As a consequence of its motion the clock goes more slowly than when at rest. Here also the velocity $c$ plays the part of an unattainable limiting velocity.

\subsection{References} This article is derived from the Einstein Reference Archive (marxists.org) 1999, 2002. \htmladdnormallink{Einstein Reference Archive}{http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/einstein/index.htm} which is under the FDL copyright.

\end{document}