Talk:PlanetPhysics/QED

Original TeX Content from PlanetPhysics Archive
%%% This file is part of PlanetPhysics snapshot of 2011-09-01 %%% Primary Title: QED %%% Primary Category Code: 03.65.Fd %%% Filename: QED.tex %%% Version: 7 %%% Owner: bci1 %%% Author(s): bci1 %%% PlanetPhysics is released under the GNU Free Documentation License. %%% You should have received a file called fdl.txt along with this file. %%% If not, please write to gnu@gnu.org. \documentclass[12pt]{article} \pagestyle{empty} \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in} \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}

\setlength{\topmargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\headsep}{0.00in} \setlength{\headheight}{0.00in} \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in} \setlength{\textheight}{9.00in} \setlength{\voffset}{0.00in} \setlength{\hoffset}{0.00in} \setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.00in} \setlength{\marginparsep}{0.00in} \setlength{\parindent}{0.00in} \setlength{\parskip}{0.15in}

\usepackage{html}

% this is the default PlanetPhysics preamble. as your knowledge % of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but % it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files %\usepackage{psfrag} % need this for including graphics (\includegraphics) %\usepackage{graphicx} % for neatly defining theorems and propositions %\usepackage{amsthm} % making logically defined graphics %\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here

\begin{document}

\section{Quantum electrodynamics (\em Q.E.D)} Q.E.D-- is the advanced, standard mathematical and quantum physics treatment of electromagnetic interactions through several approaches, the more advanced including the path-integral approach by Feynman, Dirac's \htmladdnormallink{operator}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumOperatorAlgebra4.html} and QED Equations, thus including either Special or \htmladdnormallink{general relativity}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/SR.html} formulations of electromagnetic phenomena. More recent approaches have involved \htmladdnormallink{spinor}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/ECartan.html} (Cartan and Weyl) and twistor (Penrose) \htmladdnormallink{representations}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CategoricalGroupRepresentation.html} of Quantum \htmladdnormallink{Hilbert spaces}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/NormInducedByInnerProduct.html} of quantum states and \htmladdnormallink{observable}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumSpinNetworkFunctor2.html} quantum oprators. QED results are currently at precision levels beyond 10âˆ’29, and thus it is one of the most precise, if not the most precise, physical theories that however does not encompass gravity.

\subsection{Measurements and Quantum Field Theories}

{The question of measurement in \htmladdnormallink{quantum mechanics}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumParadox.html} (\htmladdnormallink{QM}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/FTNIR.html}) and quantum field theory (QFT) has flourished for about 75 years. The intellectual stakes have been dramatically high, and the problem rattled the development of 20th (and 21st) century physics at the foundations. Up to 1955, Bohr's Copenhagen school dominated the terms and practice of quantum mechanics having reached (partially) eye--to--eye with Heisenberg on empirical grounds, although not the case with \htmladdnormallink{Einstein}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/AlbertEinstein.html} who was firmly opposed on grounds on incompleteness with respect to physical reality. Even to the present day, the hard philosophy of this school is respected throughout most of \htmladdnormallink{theoretical physics}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/PhysicalMathematics2.html}. On the other hand, post 1955, the measurement problem adopted a new lease of life when von Neumann's beautifully formulated QM in the mathematically rigorous context of Hilbert spaces. Measurement it was argued involved the influence of the Schr\"odinger equation for time evolution of the \htmladdnormallink{wave}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CosmologicalConstant.html} \htmladdnormallink{function}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Bijective.html} $\psi$, so leading to the notion of entanglement of states and the indeterministic reduction of the wave packet. Once $\psi$ is determined it is possible to compute the probability of measurable outcomes, at the same time modifying $\psi$ relative to the probabilities of outcomes and observations eventually causes its collapse. The well--known paradox of Schr\"odinger's cat and the Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen (\htmladdnormallink{EPR}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/FluorescenceCrossCorrelationSpectroscopy.html}) experiment are questions mooted once dependence on reduction of the wave packet is jettisoned, but then other interesting paradoxes have shown their faces. Consequently, QM opened the door to other interpretations such as `the hidden variables' and the Everett--Wheeler assigned measurement within different worlds, theories not without their respective shortcomings.

Arm--in--arm with the measurement problem goes a problem of `the right logic', for quantum mechanical/complex biological \htmladdnormallink{systems}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/GenericityInOpenSystems.html} and \htmladdnormallink{quantum gravity}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/LQG2.html}. It is well--known that classical Boolean truth--valued logics are patently inadequate for \htmladdnormallink{quantum theory}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/SpaceTimeQuantizationInQuantumGravityTheories.html}. Logical theories founded on projections and self--adjoint operators on Hilbert space $H$ do run in to certain problems. One `no--go' \htmladdnormallink{theorem}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Formula.html} is that of Kochen--Specker (KS) which for $\dim H \geq 3$, does not permit an evaluation (global) on a Boolean system of `truth values'. In Butterfield and Isham (1999)--(2004) self--adjoint operators on $H$ with purely discrete \htmladdnormallink{spectrum}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CohomologyTheoryOnCWComplexes.html} are considered. The KS theorem is then interpreted as saying that a particular \htmladdnormallink{presheaf}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CommutativeRingWithUnit.html} does not admit a global \htmladdnormallink{section}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/IsomorphicObjectsUnderAnIsomorphism.html}. Partial valuations corresponding to local sections of this presheaf are introduced, and then generalized evaluations are defined. The latter enjoy the structure of a Heyting algebra and so comprise an intuitionistic logic. Truth values are describable in terms of sieve--valued maps, and the generalized evaluations are identified as subobjects in a \htmladdnormallink{topos}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/GrothendieckTopos.html}. The further relationship with interval valuations motivates associating to the presheaf a \htmladdnormallink{von Neumann algebra}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumOperatorAlgebra4.html} where the supports of states on the algebra determines this relationship.

We turn now to another facet of \htmladdnormallink{quantum measurement}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CosmologicalConstant.html}. Note first that \htmladdnormallink{QFT}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CategoricalQuantumLMAlgebraicLogic2.html} \htmladdnormallink{pure states}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/PureState.html} resist description in terms of \htmladdnormallink{field}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CosmologicalConstant.html} configurations since the former are not always physically interpretable. \htmladdnormallink{Algebraic Quantum Field Theory}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CosmologicalConstant.html} (\htmladdnormallink{AQFT}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/PureState.html}) as expounded by Roberts (2004) points to various questions raised by considering theories of (unbounded) operator --valued distributions and nets of von Neumann algebras. Using in part a gauge theoretic approach, the idea is to regard two field theories as equivalent when their associated nets of observables are isomorphic. More specifically, AQFT considers taking (additive) nets of field algebras over subsets of Minkowski space, which among other properties, enjoy either Bose--Einstein (for \htmladdnormallink{particles}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Particle.html} of integer or xero \htmladdnormallink{spin}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuarkAntiquarkPair.html}) or Fermi (for particles of spin-1/2) commutation \htmladdnormallink{relations}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Bijective.html}. Although at first glance there may be analogs with \htmladdnormallink{sheaf theory}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/PAdicMeasure.html}, theses analogs are severely limited. The typical net does not give rise to a presheaf because the relevant \htmladdnormallink{morphisms}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/TrivialGroupoid.html} are in reverse. Closer then is to regard a net as a precosheaf, but then the additivity does not allow proceeding to a cosheaf structure. This may reflect upon some incompatibility of AQFT with those aspects of quantum gravity (\htmladdnormallink{QG}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/LQG2.html}) where for example sheaf--theoretic/topos approaches are advocated (as in e.g. Butterfield and Isham (1999)--(2004)).}

\end{document}