Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/DARK REFLECTIONS: Rossetti’s Ecce Ancilla Domini! and Manet’s Olympia

Plagiarism check
Check with TurnItIn returned only trivial similarity to attributed quotations from previously published works (e.g. Hunt 1905), not regarded as plagiarism. T.Shafee(Evo&#65120;Evo)talk 05:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Peer review 1
Thank you very much for reviewing my article, as well as your contribution to this Wikimedia project. I am currently awaiting comments from another reviewer; in the meantime, rest assured that I deeply appreciate your suggestions on how my paper can be improved, and am currently going through them, one by one. I may require elaboration for some of your comments; in order to avoid duplication of effort, I will get back to you after I read the comments from the second reviewer. Thanks again for your help! Karistich (discuss • contribs) 19:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * @Karistich Did you finish improving your manuscript based on reviewer 1 and 2's comments? If yes, please provide your response to both reviewers' comments.  OhanaUnited  Talk page  04:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

@OhanaUnited I am currently struggling with the reference format. Reviewer 2 rightly pointed out inconsistencies, but I don't know what is the preferred format for WikiJHum. Please advise. Karistich (discuss • contribs) 16:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Karistich I will find that out for you. Thanks for flagging this issue.  OhanaUnited  Talk page  21:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Karistich The preferred reference format is MLA, but we accept all major styles as long as it is consistent throughout the submission.  OhanaUnited  Talk page  00:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC)