Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Nice state history, if you can get it: Exploring open access and digital object identifier (DOI) registration in current U.S. state history journals

Checking in
Hi (and, as it looks like you created this review page), I just wanted to check to see if there'd been any movement on this article's reviews as it's been about 14 months from first submission and 10 months since the submission was acknowledged. If there's anything I can do to assist with this process, please don't hesitate to let me know. Thank you for your work on this! Kindly —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 19:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Bobamnertiopsis I will follow-up on this item with the Humanities board. However, I am less familiar with the Humanities journal than with Science and Medicine journals so I can't promise I will get an answer right away.  OhanaUnited  Talk page  20:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I know you're quite active with the WikiJournals and thought you might know who best to turn to in any case. Thanks much! —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 20:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm so sorry, this fell off my radar due to personal circumstances during the pandemic! I have emailed a reviewer this morning and hopefully there will be news on this soon. Zeromonk (discuss • contribs) 09:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, it's no trouble at all. Thanks so much! Kindly —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 14:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Update - Reviewing in progress! Zeromonk (discuss • contribs) 16:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You're the best, thanks ! —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 19:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you know when will the second reviewer provide their comment by?  OhanaUnited  Talk page  01:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keeping you in the loop. Zeromonk just informed me that she had another round of declined invites for the second peer reviewer of your article. We'll keep working at it.  OhanaUnited  Talk page  02:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update! The first reviewer offered some very insightful (but substantial) suggestions for improvement so I haven't gotten much of a start on implementing anything so that R1 and R2 are reviewing the same manuscript. —Collin (Bobamnertiopsis)t c 17:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Peer review 1
T.Shafee(Evo&#65120;Evo)talk 05:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)