Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Speciation by reinforcement

Update and a host of questions
Okay, so I mostly finalized the pre-print. I combined two articles from Wikipedia: Reinforcement (speciation) and Evidence for speciation by reinforcement. I removed all the links because I think it looks better without them (plus it's a pain to convert them all to wikilinks).

I am curious about how things will follow once peer reviewed. I see that normally a peer reviewed article gets essentially copied to Wikipedia; however, in this case, I would prefer it not. On Wikipedia, the article is split into two, but it wouldn't make sense to do that here, so I have combined them.

Further, I am unsure about the image gallery. It's nice to have some visuals for a lay reader; however, I am unsure of the best way to achieve this without cluttering up the document. I also would like the gallery (if included) to be symmetrical in the final publication (that is, an even distribution of images [e.g. 3x3 or 4x4]). Thoughts?

I also am not entirely sure if I have removed all the duplicate references. I see quite a few ref errors that I am unsure about how to fix. I also see a lot of red links that need removing in the refs (bibcodes, s2CID, etc).

Hopefully the tables can be formatted well to fit into the PDF after peer review. I have no idea how to do that either. Preventing inappropriate breaks is vital (as it will likely flow across multiple pages).

I still need to triple-check for grammar, typos, etc. as well. Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 04:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem. Point-by-point info below:
 * You're welcome to include, or not, the wikilinks (we've example articles of either sort). We actually do have a method to convert all wikilinks to point to wikipedia (placing  at the top of the page and   at the bottom) in case that's useful.
 * We've not had a submission based on combined pages before, so once the process is finished it'll be up to your preferences what (if anything) to export and to where. We're happy to advise at the time if useful.
 * I think inclusion of the gallery is fine. In the final PDF it'll be trivial to format symmetrically. In the web version, is probably the most likely to give that effect.
 * I fixed the 4 with error messages. I understand that AutoWikiBrowser can detect duplicate references. I've not used it before, but it may be worth downloading if you want to double-check.
 * The table would probably be best formatted in landscape in the final PDF (similar to this example).
 * Hope that helps. T.Shafee(Evo&#65120;Evo)talk 10:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your clarification and help! I wish I knew about the link convert trick, but honestly, I like it without. Links make reading difficult and I think Wikipedia allows too many. I should’ve removed links from WikiJournal of Science/Peripatric speciation. And yes, editors at Wiki agreed that the original article I wrote should be split into two pages, but I figured here, they are better as one. Plus I used a table instead. As for the gallery, I suppose if it looks bad in the draft, we can remove them. It’s not a huge deal.
 * One last thing: is it possible to change the article title to “Speciation by reinforcement”? I don’t like the parenthetical title as it exists because of the conflicting name of the psychology article on Wikipedia.
 * Other than that, I think I’m ready for submission for peer review. Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 15:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Editorial decision
 OhanaUnited  Talk page  01:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)