Talk:WikiJournal of Science/Binary search algorithm

Plagiarism check
✅ WMF copyvio tool using TurnItIn. Fully unique content. Sylvain Ribault (discuss • contribs) 12:43, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Suggestions by spontaneous reviewer
--Bert Niehaus (discuss • contribs) 14:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Add a summary or conclusion to the paper. e.g. Comparision of approaches PROs and CONs.
 * Draw a conclusion/references to current topics in computer sciences, e.g. requirements and constraints for application of binary search on Big Data.
 * Classify the paper - seems not to be a Original Research Paper (encyclopedic paper). Could be in general part of the header of any WikiJournal paper (incorporate in the template).
 * What is the knowledge a reader will gain, if she/he is reading the paper. Just one sentence in Abstract and answers that sentence in the summary or conclusions of the paper.

Editorial recommendation
Sylvain Ribault (discuss • contribs) 20:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Note by author
I will start working on making edits now, and I aim to have the issues fixed in at most 2 weeks. Esquivalience (discuss • contribs) 22:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

On delay
Apologies for the delay, I had some personal obligations that kept me busy in the last month, but I plan to work on the fixes now. Esquivalience (discuss • contribs) 23:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Fixes

 * I believe that I have addressed the comments in the above peer reviews, with the following notes:


 * I have decided to keep both of the procedures under Duplicate elements in full explicit form as these variations may be trickier to implement if I described the changes required to convert one to the other.

Esquivalience (discuss • contribs) 20:57, 16 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I have added responses to each point above. Esquivalience (discuss • contribs) 01:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

OK, thank you, I will inform the guest editor. Sylvain Ribault (discuss • contribs) 20:52, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Editorial recommendations
Guest editor Michaël Thomazo recommends that this article be published in its present state.

I also favour publication, and will recommend it to the editorial board.

Sylvain Ribault (discuss • contribs) 20:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for showing the way with this article. The algorithm is a classic, but it is good to have such article in the wikijournal as it can serve as inspiration for journal entries in the same field. Thanks. --i⋅am⋅amz3 (discuss • contribs) 15:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)