User:Bert Niehaus/2017/Disruption Pages

Description of Case

 * Disruption of User Pages and Wikiversity Content with different accounts.
 * [Example of Disruption]
 * Disruption was rapidly detected and reverted, disruptive activities remained, vandalism increased on other pages "watch" mechanism in Wikiversity allowed rapid rollback.
 * Cause of disruption was unclear, reason not visible, with smile on of people on images it seems to be a fun activity to disrupt pages on Wikipedia/Wikiversity.
 * This causes a defence mode to protect pages temporarily without a chance to get an idea, "WHY" someone disrupts wiki resources.
 * User did not provide links to discussions or talk pages that provide insights in the cause of effect "vandalism".

Conclusion

 * A community can create feedback to perceived or real unfair treatment if the community members can explore the origine of frustration, injustice, ....
 * A neutral point of view includes the requirement of accessing all opinions and wiki resources that contribute to full picture of a conflict between community members.
 * Good faith assumption: Response to disruption
 * (Step 1) "What is your problem with this content?"
 * (Step 2) Explore provided resources for problem, guide disruptive forces into problem solving discussion on discussion page (if possible) and involve community for support if a deeper analysis assesses the problem as servere or indicates a violation of the wiki community foundations.
 * (Step 3) To sacrifice the freedom to edit certain resources or block users is only the ultimate measure to protect the educational goods generated by the community.
 * Diversity of Opinion is a driver for innovation and requirement to accomplish a neutral point of view.
 * Personal Conclusion to feedback: More effort to identify the cause of an effect (vandalism) if possible and if user is willing to share the causes for vandalism.