User:EuropeanQoheleth

In which he points out yet more Wikimedia atheist bias (no there isn't anything I can do about it as some other user would just undo the changes).


 * Most, if not all, of the Recommended readings here are by atheists.
 * Saying religion is just argument from assertion (does anyone even bother with NPOV anymore?)
 * Complete the Wikiversity course Beyond Theism. (Where's the Beyond Atheism course? Oh wait, there isn't one.)
 * If you hold religious beliefs, examine them to identify the brute facts and the social constructs that form the basis for your beliefs. (These internet atheists never bother to examine their own and I'm not following the orders of some human if religion is false anyway.)
 * When did you agree to accept those social constructs? '' (Don' t ask loaded questions.)
 * Attempts to define a specific point in time when human life begins is mismatched with the continuous nature of fertilization, embryo development, fetal development, and the brute fact that a soul is only an illusion. Brute fact according to...one atheist source. We know when life begins, what people don't agree on is when it has any value.
 * Lack of editors leading to one-sided articles.
 * Lack of editors leading to one-sided articles.