User talk:2602:306:BCE3:C860:D128:8300:1857:61F3

There are appropriate ways to contest proposed deletion. Vandalizing templates is not one of them. You need to respond to User:Guy vandegrift's request posted at TV One. If the disruptive edits continue, your address will be blocked. Let me know if you have any questions. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 01:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Dave is right, you need to help us justify it. Please do it right here.

--Guy vandegrift (discuss • contribs) 12:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

No educational objectives or discussion in history
Hi!

I was about to delete Sparks but noticed a message concerning the resource. With respect to "No educational objectives or discussion in history", FYI I am using Upper Limb Orthotics and its creator Sarah Anderson as a control group. She took the time to let us (Custodians) know her educational objectives (e.g., learning resource, course, something) and likely additional participants (patients and participants). While this is not required, it helps us know what's going on so we can differentiate between vandalism (which Sparks is not), solicitation (which Sparks is not), and Wikipedia copies which Sparks appears to be; hence, the "No educational objectives or discussion in history" deletion tag.

We have a department of film and television of the school of film and a school of history. Sparks is from 1998 by your outline and entries so far. This (these) resources could fall under one of these departments or schools depending on what you would like to pursue. Please let us know either here or on the resource discuss page.

If this is part of a school project and you have an advisor, please write this down here or on the discuss page for Sparks if applicable. If it's your own interest or historical research, please let us know. I will not delete Sparks for one week to let you respond. Even after that if you write something (a clue, perhaps) deleted items can be easily restored. Thanks! --Marshallsumter (discuss • contribs) 18:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Note that the user currently may only respond at User talk:2602:306:BCE3:C860:3D66:93AC:3F4F:979B. This will change when the IP address changes, but any additional vandalism would result in additional blocks.  -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 18:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Didn't we have another IP (or possibly the same IP, I don't know) who did the same thing as this IP is doing? Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 13:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * IPv6 lesson: There is a security feature built into IPv6 where the second half of the address changes frequently. This prevents attacks on individual addresses, because the addresses change faster than you can sweep an entire network to find the hosts.  Any work coming from addresses starting with 2602:306:BCE3:C860: is the same user.  -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 14:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)