User talk:Bugmenot123123123

 Hello and Welcome to Wikiversity Bugmenot123123123! You can contact us with questions at the colloquium or me personally when you need help. Please remember to sign and date your finished comments when participating in discussions. The signature icon above the edit window makes it simple. All users are expected to abide by our Privacy, Civility, and the Terms of Use policies while at Wikiversity.

To get started, you may


 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.
 * Explore Wikiversity with the links to your left.
 * Enable VisualEditor under Beta settings to make article editing easier.


 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.
 * Follow Wikiversity on twitter (http://twitter.com/Wikiversity) and identi.ca (http://identi.ca/group/wikiversity).

You do not need to be an educator to edit. You only need to be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage. See you around Wikiversity! --Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 16:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Learning Projects
Wikiversity content is based on learning projects with subpages rather than individual articles. I've moved the content to Data Breach and subpages. Pages created under Data Breach will automatically be added to the list of incidents.

Please do not duplicate content already at Wikipedia. The subpage content needs to go beyond a List of data breaches and teach people either about the incidents or how to limit or avoid their risk as part of a breach.

Let me know if you have any questions. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 21:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Notice The holiday break for me is gonna be over soon so I might be indefinitely absent from Wikiversity and Wikipedia to focus on my study. But I will try to get more interested contributors to improve all things related to the data breach subject via Reddit. Thank you. Bugmenot123123123 (discuss • contribs) 08:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC) cc: User:Dave Braunschweig

I've noticed that you are again creating a number of related pages as individual articles in an encyclopedia format, rather than as a learning project. All of these pages have a common theme. Please tell me what words best describe that theme. Are you interested in Information Assurance, Computer Security, CyberSecurity? What is the title of the Wikipedia page that best describes your overall interest? All of these things can be combined under a learning project with that title. As stand-alone pages, they will be removed as not having any educational objectives. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 18:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Computer Security is their common theme. Bugmenot123123123 (discuss • contribs) 18:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


 * These are all intended as case studies. Bugmenot123123123 (discuss • contribs) 18:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I would love to suggest moving the List of case studies of computer hackers into a subpage of "Computer Security". Thank you. Bugmenot123123123 (discuss • contribs) 19:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Computer Security main learning project page is now set up with Computer Hacker and Data Breach subprojects. Thanks! -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 19:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! At the same time ethical hacking would be best suited under that project. Bugmenot123123123 (discuss • contribs) 19:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


 * ✅ -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 20:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Bugmenot's authorized representative
I'm /u/heh5478 or /u/onecharacter his close friend. According to his sister Bugmenot/Jonathan was hit by an accident months ago he was hit by an accident months ago. Before that Jonathan entrusted me to restore his first article job on Wikipedia should his article's subject surpasses w:WP:BLP1E which it did.

For that reason I'm updating this before being slapped with template for a move to the encyclopedia. 2A00:C98:2060:A008:4:0:0:1 (discuss) 17:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry to hear about Bugmenot's accident. However, Wikiversity may not be used to violate a Wikipedia block. The content is not welcome. The effort has resulted in the content being deleted and Bugmenot's account being blocked here as well. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 19:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Sir I think you're getting it wrong. Bugmenot's Wikipedia block log indicates that he was blocked on 5th of January, while his first activity at here is on the 3rd of January! 2A00:C98:2050:A016:10:0:0:1 (discuss) 20:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Your effort here was to update an article and then have it moved to Wikipedia, in violation of a block. This isn't a timing issue. It's approach. We're not open to using Wikiversity to violate Wikipedia blocks, and we're not open to users who would attempt such efforts. Encyclopedia articles belong at Wikipedia. If you want an article updated on Wikipedia, please update it yourself. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 20:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Isn't it correct that blocked editor's materials can still be used by others provided it's helpful enough? I heard that "ignore all rules" that allows trespassing if the end is a productive contribution? Next it was in non-wikified style before I interceded today so what you hit is the strawman. Sigh.2A00:C98:2060:A008:7:0:0:1 (discuss) 20:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm usually neutral on controversies but this time for God's sake I'll be blunt - You're silly and petty for arbitrarily placing a block on an incapacitated user. There is NO such rule that prohibiting blocked users to continue their work on other projects as long as they're constructive and beneficial; in fact they're encouraged to spend their times there as part of their standard offer. This would go to the court soon if I'm his family member so please think about it again. Bye! 2A00:C98:2060:A008:7:0:0:1 (discuss) 18:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


 * We have consensus that Wikiversity cannot be used to bypass a block on another project. Whatever the circumstances, the approach is not welcome. If this continues, the rest of the content can be deleted as well, as it is having a net negative effect on Wikiversity. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 20:57, 18 April 2018 (UTC)