User talk:Edward Hyde~enwikiversity

 Hello Edward Hyde, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon in the edit window makes it simple. All users are expected to abide by our Privacy policy, Civility policy, and the Terms of Use while at Wikiversity.

To get started, you may


 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.
 * Explore Wikiversity with the links to your left.


 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.
 * Follow Wikiversity on twitter (http://twitter.com/Wikiversity) and identi.ca (http://identi.ca/group/wikiversity).

You don't need to be an educator to edit. You only need to be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage. See you around Wikiversity! --Leutha 20:34, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Servetus
Welcome to Wikiversity. I have added a link to the page you created to the en.wikipedia article on Servetus, and I've placed a link to your article on History of Europe to 1648, which is a very broad categorization. The article may eventually belong to a course on the Medieval history of Spain, or to medical history. I'm just putting it somewhere for now. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. --Abd 20:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, that sounds great. In few weeks I will add photos of all the official documents I rely on.And later I will edit his life,i will present again photos of all the documents i rely on. I want to document absolutely everything I defend. Thanks.--Edward Hyde 03:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

The problem is I want to share this new discoveries, and for they are true and  i can give proofs  of em,  photos,, references to  actual official documents and international congresses of the international society of history of medicine,  i was thinking , why not to put it in the main servetus website for wikiversity? Do you think it is a good idea?


 * Please do start to think in terms of study rather than argument and defense. By all means, you can point to study resources, original documents, etc., but you don't need to prove anything here, and we aren't going to judge you and your content based on proof, because we don't have an article to defend or protect, as such. Further, who would judge? We have educational resources on Wikiversity. Start to think in terms of the study of Servetus, and what a seminar on Servetus might look at, what ideas and theories it might discuss, etc. You may create subpages on controversies, to study them. You may present your own point of view, your own conclusions, as long as you state them as such. You may also say what you believe is uncontroversially true, without attributing it as your own opinion, or as the opinion of a stated source, if nobody objects.
 * If someone objects, we'll work out how to handle it, there is almost always a way, and it doesn't usually involve figuring out who is "right." (This isn't a "rule." If someone comes in with what can be recognized as nonsense, or very ignorant opinion, with no foundation in sources, it might get excluded, but even there, there can be ways to accommodate users with "fringe opinions," while making sure that Wikiversity is balanced and neutral. "Balance" isn't about the number of pages, or number of words, it is about how a topic is presented, especially at the top level.
 * As to the "official documents," you may be able to put those on Wikisource, it might be preferable. But you may upload images here. You may at first just refer to the documents. You may use sources more flexibly here than on Wikipedia. You may point to blogs, to unofficial web pages, etc. Think in terms of serving students of your topic. If you can, become an advocate of the topic itself -- i.e., interest in it, more than of some point of view on the topic. But you may still keep and express your point of view.
 * Don't worry! You can make lots of mistakes here, and people aren't blocked for them, as you may have seen elsewhere. Just be civil! Respect the rights of others. Simple stuff, really.
 * A possible seminar project might be a section to be added to a Wikipedia article, or possibly even a whole article. This would not be at the top level, it would be a project under a seminar. If interested users can find consensus here, on an improved article, which respects Wikipedia requirements for sourcing, etc., it's then possible to propose this on Wikipedia. But that's down the road. First build resources for the study of Servetius. --Abd 05:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Ok I added the seminar entry. I mean, the works were presented at the Intenational congresses i mentioned, do you consider they should be moved to another seminar? I would say they are not controversial, just not  very well known yet.I remarked they were accepted by the  ISHM, not that they are truly, by servetus, which actually should not generate a lot of polemic but  i dont know .what do you think? Maybe i can also post a seminar with pictures for going deep into the research?

Wikiversity scholars and students may present personal opinion and conclusion on this document on Talk:Servetus/De Villeneuve-Servetus name&birth controversy--Edward Hyde 05:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Abd's nomination for full custodianship
Discussion re-opened on this nomination, November 16. You commented in the original discussion, but have not commented in the current one, which might close on November 21. The current discussion is at Candidates for Custodianship/Abd (full custodian). --Abd 20:28, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Edward Hyde. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Edward Hyde~enwikiversity that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)