User talk:EttoreGreco/Wavevolution

The following content, of the nature of an essay, was added to Wikiversity by the same author, in a mainspace page, Wavevolution, which might be deleted. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 20:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC) - The progressive science of Wavevolution is the transformation from waves to atoms and its correlation to new understandings of the relation between Space and Time.

Wavevolution extends the concept of evolution to all forms of energy through a process of gradual changes that transform waves into atoms.

All elements have one electric charge, one counterpart and one mass.

Mass-less does not exist.

Symmetry is everywhere.

Neutral elements are composites of two opposite charges and are not elementary particles.

Wavevolution is the energy transformation opposite to Nuclear fission.

Wavevolution is also the link that was missing to reveal the Creation.

The origin of the Universe is revealed even by the spark appearing from the friction of two cutting blades while they are being sharpened. Try to videotape the spark appearing from those two blades, then watch again the same film while is being rewound and in slow motion. You will see the light from the spark entering the blades and becoming part of them. In fact, the photons of light are the "building blocks" of the metal blades. This simple example should also be a clear indication to explain how the whole mass had been formed in the Universe. Since the Big Bang, waves continue to solidify into hydrogen atoms and transform their energy in different forms of mass. The Human beings, made up of atoms, are the ultimate product of a slow process started with transformed waves.

In Wavevolution all forms of energy constantly transform. The same quantum of energy originally carried by any wave becomes gradually fragmented and dispersed by the encountered interferences. For example, quanta of gamma rays over time will lower their potential to become X rays and X rays will gradually become ultraviolet rays diminishing their original frequencies. The initial quantum of energy is transformed into different other forms of energy through spontaneous symmetry breaking. Once they have reached one critical level of energy, lost heat as they travel and having therefore reduced their frequencies, waves collapse, also forming two subatomic particles with opposite charges, as if they were the split ends of one broken hair.

Wavevolution shows how the behavior in waves and atoms is identical and how this single movement common to all energy is comparable to One Divine Will that creates the whole Universe. This constant movement, Quantum mechanics, is here intended as the natural Law of Attraction between two opposite and complementary electric charges.

The discovery of the existence of One Universal Law that had one beginning about 14 billion years ago and that was not caused by Humankind confirms as a consequence the existence of One Creator.

New and Old Science:

In spite of two findings from Einstein and Planck, one to show the equation between atoms and energy and the other to discover the constant between waves' frequencies and energy, traditional science has never closed the circle. Like at the end of the rope because of self imposed limitations, still today, this now old science does not recognize the transformation from waves to atoms.

The bureaucracy of traditional science denies the recognition of Wavevolution since its verification does not meet some of the pre-established criteria. The problem is in the compilation of these laws or criteria like the “uncertainty principle” from Heisenberg which was introduced as a pillar of science and that is not only erroneous as it is, but also became an insurmountable obstacle for all scientific progress, imposing limits that makes it impossible to recognize the concept of simultaneity. This antiquated system of rules is also the cause of misleading theories.

For example, Space is not “curved”. In Einstein's paradigm, a stone that falls on the ground from the window of a moving train also marks one parabola in Space. Although, this path is only apparent since the Earth is also moving and the Time spent by the stone to reach the ground has also changed to some degree that imaginary vertical line. At the Time of the initial Movement when the stone falls from the window its potential trajectory is one perpendicular Space that is no longer the same as the stone continues to move until it hits the ground. If the scientist had known that the coordinates of Space in Time are unique and unrepeatable then all the rest would have also been "straight". That perpendicular is straight but accounted as “curve” because of the limits imposed to science in regard to the concept of simultaneity. In reference to any one body, on each moment in Time, there are always only two coordinates in Space for one perpendicular if Time and Movement (or speed) were accounted for in simultaneity. And with two coordinates there is no curve. One perpendicular is unrepeatable and never the same because while the measure of it is repeatable and any measurement can be applied for different segments instead one perpendicular marked in Time will never again have that same spatial positioning. The perpendicular changes in Time but Einstein believed that the concept of Space is independent from the concept of Time.

Another example is in the special theory of relativity. This is in regard to Einstein's example of two beams of light hitting one same embankment of a railroad on two Points: Point A and Point B. In between the two there is also the middle point, Point M. If one train were to run over that track then on the train we would also have Point A1 on the wagon of the train right above Point A and one other corresponding Point B1 right above Point B. We would also have on the train Point M1 above Point M. Einstein's theory is that as for Point M (not moving because on the embankment) those two beams are simultaneous and equidistant, instead, for the passenger sitting on Point M1 and moving towards Point B1 (and also toward Point B) the two beams are not simultaneous because the beam in Point B1 is being approached by the moving train, therefore closer to Point M1. In this example, while Einstein’s concept of Time is rigidly kept unchanged in regard to the embankment, instead, the concept of Space is extended also to the next moment in Time when the traveler will move even if in that precise instant the traveler has not moved yet. Since the concept of simultaneity had been put aside, Einstein considered Time to be the same while Space instead had changed.

Destiny - Principle of Certainty

Destiny implies one certainty of Movement in Time for any particle in the Universe. The credibility of this Divine concept was placed in doubt by a small group of scientists beginning in 1927 when they imposed, in legal terms for science, their personal interpretation of both Quantum Mechanics and concept of causality. That year in Copenhagen, the scientist Heisenberg introduced the “uncertainty principle” and according to this it is not possible to exactly determine at the same Time the Space and Movement of a particle. The problem is that to obtain an exact position occupied in Space, for example, by an electron it takes the use of short wavelengths which transfer to the electron a great amount of energy turning that electron unpredictable and uncontrollable. Instead, to obtain a precise account of the Movement of the electron it takes a very small amount of light (very long wave) which results in a poor definition of the position in Space of that particle. The more exact and defined is the Space of a particle the more difficult is to know its Movement and vice versa. Heisenberg manifested his frustration in the inability to determine the exact position of an electron and with his uncertainty principle it was then decided that what could not be observed with human eye will not be part of science. Since then, simultaneity and repeatability remain the boundaries of traditional science.

Nevertheless, the fact that we can not yet observe the exact Space and Movement of one electron should not imply that the electron does not occupy one position in Space at any given moment in Time.

It is evident that our knowledge occurs through the perception of our senses but it should be equally evident that One World exists and It is independent from our senses.

The philosophy of Subjectivism from Bohr, Einstein and Heisenberg believes that when one electron or one photon is not observed it does not have any position and its position becomes materialized only as consequence of one human observation. In the name of science, that arrogant assumption was sealed by these three scientists since 1927, and made into a "law".

One new Progressive Science will have to become more relevant before Humankind could see the first lights of a new dawn.