User talk:Givememyusername/ENES-100/Project 1


 * no "I" statements on CDIO page
 * work flow is who does what ... a list of positions and what they do to implement ... not your task .. that belongs on the project page under week 1 .. not a list of what you did
 * "Research" means nothing unless it produces a documnent. "Googled water ram for basic understanding" benefits nobody else in the world. The CDIO page is designed to benefit other people, not describe your own learning curve.

This stuff is better off in a "conceive CDIO document".
 * Found gif about pyramids .. need more context ... site appears to promote a breed of dog, ... looks like part of a good presentation story but need more respectable site to link to
 * Unable statements make no sense, add no value ... either don't mention or state as goal in the conceive document: "want to place pressure measurement devices on pipes to see if can capture the pressure wave movement" ... same thing with the ratios, same thing with the makerbot ..

10/10/10 --1sfoerster (discuss • contribs) 20:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

CDIO page has personal names in it ... is not written in the passive voice.

Research is a bad word.

I am editing it.

Most everything on the page belongs in project narrative. Can not figure out who is doing what. Lost transparency.

"Creating piston part is proving to be more difficult than expected." What have you tried, what is the problem? Can you present the problem to class? Is currently written as an "issue."

10/0/0 --1sfoerster (discuss • contribs) 21:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

0/0/0 ... nothing to grade --1sfoerster (discuss • contribs) 14:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

10/10/80 .. wow! --1sfoerster (discuss • contribs) 01:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)