User talk:Grind24

creating User:N Basheer Ahamed
You created a user page for this user, who has no edits to Wikiversity. Why? You created the page only to ask for speedy deletion of it. The user is globally locked for spamming (at your request). There seems to be no point to this, it simply made a small bit of work for a local admin. Please don't do that. Thanks.

One other point: your Talk page message implies that leaving you notices here will be useless. You are active here, please be responsive to notices or requests here. I would notify you on en.wiki as requested, but I'd have to violate a site ban to do it. We even have had or have administrators here who cannot legitimately edit en.wiki. Thanks for understanding. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 22:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks . When I have tag the page for deletion I received an error message, as retrying the page was already deleted, What made that another tag appeared after delettion. Regards.--Grind24 (discuss • contribs) 17:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I think you misread something.


 * First of all, what are you doing, tagging user pages of users with no edits here for deletion? If they contain spam, they may be blanked. In this case, you created the page with your request for deletion. It did not already exist. The user exists here, but with no edits, the registration was an automatic one. The deletion reason created from our normal speedy deletion process would create an erroneous impression that the user spammed Wikiversity. The user did not. The deletion log for the page shows only one deletion, of the page as tagged by me, revising your tag. Notice that the reason says "vandalism." I did not say that. That is because the creation of a user page not by the user is often considered vandalism. I understand that it was simply an error. But I'm suggesting more caution.


 * Evidence:


 * Special:CentralAuth/N_Basheer_Ahamed. The user has single edits on eight wikis, which edits readily qualified the user for a global lock. However, no edit here.
 * related log here. You can see, the page was only deleted once, not before your edit. Above, I notified you about your speedy deletion tag, at 22:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC), and the deletion was at 12:33, 14 August 2015.


 * We do not normally notify spam-only or vandalism-only accounts, hence we don't create those talk pages, which just clutter up the database. If there was spam on a page, we may delete it, though sometimes we will look for some shred of an educational purpose. Because the Wikibooks user page is still undeleted, I am copying that content to the user talk page here. The user might possibly see it. We would welcome certain kinds of content about the user's topic here. There were no links with the posting. I'll agree it was "spammed," but we will sometimes accept content here that has been spammed elsewhere. The user is globally locked, but may, at least by policy, create a new account and edit. By attracting users with unusual goals here, we tend to reduce disruption elsewhere. But usually they don't respond. If the user set up email, we would not know, because the global lock turns it all off, we cannot email the user.


 * Thanks for calling attention to this user. Engaging users who otherwise may be or may become LTAs is a project here. Once in a while, it works. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 18:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * A question. In your meta global lock request, you mentioned "LTA." I have found, so far, one prior account, blocked for COI, that would not have been the basis, itself, for LTA. Can you identify the puppet master or is there an LTA summary page, so I can know more of the history here? I have now emailed the user, and will be working to prevent further disruption. Knowing more about what has already happened can help. Thanks. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 22:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)