User talk:Hapoth/Four potential gravitation

Nomination of "Four potential gravitation" for the "proposed deletion" template?
There was a discussion of this page at.

This page will probably be moved to a different location, either as an Essay under Physics/Essays, or possibly as an essay page under Gravitation, or to the user space of the author. This should be discussed. Meanwhile, in this location, it may need the Fringe tag at least to respect the opinion of a user that it is fringe physics. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 22:54, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * There's not a lot to discuss here. It's not top-level content.  As an essay, it should be moved to user space until the author is ready to seek public perspective of the work.  At that point, the author may choose which of the various learning projects best fits the work.  But a case has been clearly made that it should not stand alone where it is now.  -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 12:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Any user may make this move. I often do it, but I've been asked not to do so, not yet. We do have a general consensus to move this page. (But the decision may be different for this page and for Scalar theories of gravitation, which is also a work of the same author. The user who proposed deletion of this page also proposed deletion of the "Poths's theory" section of the latter page. That section might be an essay under the scalar theories page, which might itself be moved underneath Gravitation. As pointed out in talk there, the user could simply have blanked the section, and we'd want to see discussion if that were contested. (And if I saw that, I'd handle the issue by framing.)
 * Our policies allow very free creation of content without "proof" in w:Wikipedia:Reliable source. We do not require notability, as such.


 * However, we will not maintain content in mainspace in the presence of objection, unless we can find consensus on keeping it there. Rather, we frame such content, by tagging it or moving it. We can even fork a resource into attributed or managed sections, with a top-level page neutrally linking. We have many techniques available for finding consensus, which is why formally contested deletion has become rare on Wikiversity, and why Wikiversity is a safe place for students and teachers to work.


 * These techniques are generally manageable by ordinary users, they do not require administrative tools. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 14:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)