User talk:JohnCMaguire

 Hello and Welcome to Wikiversity JohnCMaguire! You can contact us with questions at the colloquium or me personally when you need help. Please remember to sign and date your finished comments when participating in discussions. The signature icon above the edit window makes it simple. All users are expected to abide by our Privacy, Civility, and the Terms of Use policies while at Wikiversity.

To get started, you may


 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.
 * Explore Wikiversity with the links to your left.


 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.
 * Follow Wikiversity on twitter (http://twitter.com/Wikiversity) and identi.ca (http://identi.ca/group/wikiversity).

You do not need to be an educator to edit. You only need to be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage. See you around Wikiversity! --Abd (discuss • contribs) 00:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
... for all your work on Cold fusion, especially the Cold fusion/Theory page. I attempted to revert your addition of the "Super-wave theory," since SuperWave isn't a theory, it's a specific waveform that was found to work. Instead I merely reverted a correction you had made, must have looked weird to you.... See the attached Talk page. I've now taken it out. If we have anything on SuperWave, it would belong on a page on experimental approaches. There is some cross-over with the NiH work of Defkalion Green Technologies; they are using a plasma stimulation that takes the nickel out of stasis, seriously shakes it up. They might be using a complex waveform, and it wouldn't be surprising if that turned out to be more effective. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 03:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)


 * No Problem. Understood. Makes sense. Happy to contribute. Hope my additions are at least partially cogent. Will be adding something on Hagelstein theory over next couple days once I reread a couple of his papers.--JohnCMaguire (discuss • contribs) 03:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Your work is helping to improve the resource. Wikivesity is designed for learning by doing. You are doing what will stimulate your own learning, and it will also blaze a path for others. Little by little, we go far. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 03:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey added to Kim BEC and created a Hagelstein theory. Hagelstein's is hard to pin down at times, and I may have misread some of Kim as well, so if there's anything to tweak there let me know.--JohnCMaguire (discuss • contribs) 04:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)