User talk:Joschtony/Sandbox

Personal content of user talk of Joschtony in Sandbox.
By freedom of speech, that is true in fact, by the 1st Bill of Right of the original "Bill of Rights," of these, the United States of America, one of the three "Charters of Freedom," ^ "1)" under the "s o u r c e s", bibliography, in truth by freedom of expression, a book based not only on current science being used, including human behavior expertise by societal trends used for social constructionist engineering, by putting into effect for years of decades, "nudge theory,"^ "n)" thereby, n for "[n]udge" under the "s o u r c e s", bibliography, --Joschtony (discuss • contribs) 17:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "Abstract '''So-called nudge policies utilize insights from behavioral science to achieve policy outcomes. Nudge policies try to improve people's decisions by changing the ways options are presented to them, rather than changing the options themselves or incentivizing or coercing people. Nudging has been met with great enthusiasm but also fierce criticism. This paper provides an overview of the debate on the ethics of nudging to date. After outlining arguments in favor of nudging, we first discuss different objections that all revolve around the worry that nudging vitiates personal autonomy. We split up this worry into different dimensions of autonomy, such as freedom of choice, volitional autonomy, rational agency, and freedom as nondomination. We next discuss worries that nudging is manipulative, violates human dignity, and prevents more important structural reform. Throughout, we will present responses that proponents of nudging can muster. On the whole, we conclude that the objections fail to establish that the nudge program as a whole should be rejected. At the same time, they give us important guidance when moving towards an ethical assessment of nudges on a case-by-case basis. Towards the end, we provide some possible ways forward in debates around the ethics of nudging." - link is, https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/phc3.12658 '''

This following quote illustrates how human behavior expertise has been utilized in a particular fashion to use freedom of decision inherent to each individual human being person at various years of life, and the ramifications of the formed societal trends that form a popular support;- thereby;- The particulars of the popular support that results used to let freedom of decision continue continued use of determinates for certain goals that result in legal interchange of dialogue, true in fact, however, this resulting determination, that is use of freedom of speech under result of nudged human behavior expertise decidedly a formed climate of societies by the result of popular support formed by nudges of human behavior expertise has news reports of taking off the shelves copies of "_The Holy Bible_" for example, for determinates such as by the following quote, from an online resource article, titled, "READING & LITERACY "Why the Bible Is Getting Pulled Off School Bookshelves By Eesha Pendharkar — December 15, 2022"^ "2)" under the "s o u r c e s",;- thereby the quotes are as follows, "However, no book should be evaluated on individual excerpts or sentences, according to Kacey Meehan, the Freedom to Read program director for PEN America.  “In all book reviews, the precedent is that you review the book as a whole,” Meehan said. “You don’t look at a page and pull the page with an image or with a line that may have sexual contact or talk about violence.”  "Michelle White, a spokesperson for the district, said the book was only briefly out of circulation. “When the Bible was challenged as library   material, Escambia County public schools followed its reconsideration policy and placed it in a Restricted Access area during the review   process,” she said. “Within two days, the [district] determined that the Florida legislature had already determined that the Bible is an appropriate instructional resource in public schools.” ``````````````````````

In one other source, a histro-drama, Titled, "He who honors God," posted on April 10th, 2008, having this discription, "Chariots of Fire is a British film released in 1981. Written by Colin Welland and directed by Hugh Hudson, it is based on the true story, in the early part of the 20th century, of  British athletes preparing for and competing in the 1924 Summer Olympics."^ 3)"under the "s o u r c e s" bibliography,  the voice and note depicted, of citing, "the old Book.."  In this regard, in personal reflection of "the old Book," describe by, "The Good Book," as freedom of expression,  regarding scene from "Chariots of Fire," regarding the Olympics in 1924 in France,  an athlete from the USA Olympic team having the USA flag on his sports Olympic shirt, did be depicted handing Eric Liddel a note, that cited that that God honors those who honor God.  Lastly,   the project  similar  to a histro-drama,  a honorable work ethic prose fiction development,

titled, "The Creator Granted Honor Code of ethics Influence to: Pangea of Nations," ^ "4)" under the "s o u r c e s" bibliography, for relevance to this, each of us an individual having freedom of speech, granted in impartiality by, "In the course of human events.." the Creator being cited to be "nature's God," thereby, at the end of the document the term in uppercase first letters is, "Supreme Judge," thereby, the Creator has sovereignty over "divine Providence," in that the first Continental Congress represented the then, these, United States of America,  in the year of, [the/our in someone's freedom of speech, plausibly interpreted for that person], however, commonplace had been, "B.C.," for, "Before Christ," and "A.D." for the year of our Lord;-

Thereby, the citation of common knowledge are terms from, "The Declaration of Independence," the year of our Lord, 1776, or 1776 A.D., or customs have this as "C.E.," the Common Era, and I suppose in freedom of speech, Common Epoch could be a personal perspective.