User talk:K.saunders/enes100/Sterling Engines

Saunders came up with the idea that we work separately on our different designs and compare the outcomes when we meet up in class. this was a very good idea to keep both of us thinking.qchi

0/0/0 .. don't see anything to grade 1sfoerster 18:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 10/10/80 ... good job ... the crank shaft ... lobe offset distance would be a more accurate term than the crank shaft thickness 1sfoerster 19:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Kevin helped out a lot by bringing together most of the parts we needed for our construction including the idea of using a glass top so as to be able to view how the engine actually functions

10/10/80 ... good job ... now the goal is to figure out why it is not working ... seems smooth ... fly wheel is big though ... how many rotations does your dad's do? 1sfoerster 20:39, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Kevin was very instrumental in the construction of the stirling engine designs as he was the one who came up with the ideas we used as far as the construction of the power piston was concerned.Using epoxy filled tubes turned out to be much easier to make and efficient..qchi 7:27,10 November 2011(UTC)

10/10/80 ... good job .. what would you improve to create a better chance of the engine working? 1sfoerster 21:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

10/10/50 ... good job