User talk:Laserles

 Hello and Welcome to Wikiversity Laserles! You can contact us with questions at the colloquium or me personally when you need help. Please remember to sign and date your finished comments when participating in discussions. The signature icon above the edit window makes it simple. All users are expected to abide by our Privacy, Civility, and the Terms of Use policies while at Wikiversity.

To get started, you may


 * Take a guided tour and learn to edit.
 * Visit a (kind of) random project.
 * Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education.
 * Find out about research activities on Wikiversity.
 * Explore Wikiversity with the links to your left.


 * Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity.
 * Give feedback about your initial observations
 * Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium.
 * Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en.
 * Follow Wikiversity on twitter (http://twitter.com/Wikiversity) and identi.ca (http://identi.ca/group/wikiversity).

You do not need to be an educator to edit. You only need to be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage. See you around Wikiversity! --Abd (discuss • contribs) 16:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your edit to Talk:Xenolinguistics
I've reverted your edit to this talk page, that placed a link to your web site, but that was not of the nature of a discussion of xenolinguistics, or working on the xenolinguistics reource, but just a promotion of your site. You might be able to discuss the matters of interest to you on Wikiversity, but it might be more of a discussion of how "messages" can be found in random data, or a claim that your particular messages are not such artifacts.

If you wish to begin a resource on a topic related to your images and claims, it's not impossible, but please don't just dive in, in this case. Please discuss it. You will need to do better than you did at Wikipedia Articles for Deletion]. Wikiversity is not an enyclopedia, we encourage the development of educational resources, and original research is allowed, but we still follow the WikiMedia Foundatino neutrality policy, and fringe or isolated points of view must not be stated as fact. They can, however, be discussed here, and attributed opinions are allowed. Your comment I deleted was not attributed, i.e., signed, bsides being of peripheral relevance to that Talk page.

I see that you have images on Commons. These may have avoided deletion only by escaping notice. If the files are used here, that may avoid deletion. So I'm displaying those files. They would be better as thumbnails, but I'm not taking the time to show them as such. Good luck. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 16:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Never mind. Images removed, they may be seen on this permanent version of this page.

Your edit to Talk:Extraterrestrial life/Xenolinguistics
page was moved, header corrected --Abd (discuss • contribs) 16:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC) To QUOTE Abd...: " but it might be more of a discussion of how "messages" can be found in random data, or a claim that your particular messages are not such artifacts."

Typical of someone who will 'blow-off & side-shelf real scientific data and genuine discovery. Another 'inside-the-box-drone'. 173.169.204.13 (discuss) 13:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC) 01/20/2013


 * Apparently this is not a matter considered open to discussion. Is this just another "I'm right and everyone else is wrong" drone? There is an obvious issue here, and it seems that whoever this IP is (Laserles?), is not willing to address it. I've seen no "real scientific data." Rather, a series of images, selected from what may be a vast data set, that appear as this or that, with no apparently connection with xenolinguistics, only with xeno-, i.e. allegedly this is alien artifact, though no evidence is shown for an alien origin. There is a far more likely origin, and the "scientist" here doesn't even mention it on his web page or here, other than quoting my obvious comment. Too bad. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 18:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

recreation of your user page after administrator deletion
Laserles, you may appeal deletions. That page was deleted for promotion. The procedure would be to first ask the administrator to undelete, you would do this on User talk:Dave Braunschweig. As this was a speedy deletion, normally he would undelete. If the admin still thinks the page should be deleted, he may list it on Requests for deletion. Meanwhile, it's possible that the links will be blanked. They will still be readable in page history.

Instead, with no discussion, you recreated the page. That could be considered disruptive. If you need assistance, ask. I'm watching this page, I'll see your responses here, or you may always ask for help on User talk:Abd.

You will also find that the deleting administrator is likely to be supportive if you communicate. If you just insist on having your way, you may run into a brick wall. It won't be just him.

If you want my recommendation, ask. Otherwise, I have offered. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 16:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)