User talk:Rouslan.kv/law copyright

Review
As a part of Webscience seminar I will be reviewing this chapter on law and copyright by User:Rouslan.kv. As a part of my review process I will be giving general feedback on the article, later give detailed feedback and finish with suggestions to improve the article/chapter.

General feedback
Some of the general observations are :
 * Topics are explained in detail.
 * The article is well structured with introduction, problem,solutions and finally ended with a conclusion.
 * Individual freedoms are very well explained with an example.
 * Very less scientific references are used while writing the chapter.
 * Few citations cite wikipedia which normally are not accepted as a authoritative source.
 * Some of the internal wikiversity links are given as web links.
 * The background information explaining the need for the chapters on the topics of Law and Copyright is well presented.

Licensing
At one glance I could see that there was information on free software but there is a missing part of "Open Source" software which I think should be distinguished and explained while writing about free software and licensing in particular.It Another point missing was the "forks", how would forks be handled ? Creative commons has another license called CC zero which was missing in the section of Creative Commons.The style of giving a nice introduction / background information explaining the need for licensing in the context of web was continued here.

Violations
Mega Upload case could be further expanded on which legal basis they were blocked by a certain country for the entire world.It was aptly mentioned that copyright enforcers are lobbying for new laws but the names like SOPA/PIPA were not given, there could have been a mention of that and the backlash which went to a protest by major web players. Copy right violation is quite a tricky term as mentioned with respect to torrents or peer to peer file sharing. There are laws in some countries where "uploading" is illegal while "downloading" is legal.Maybe there could be a detailed explanation on legality of torrents or peer to peer software.

International law vs regional law
Possible solutions are well explained. The background for the problem of differences between regional and global laws are also explained neatly.It would be a nice extension to add some examples which clearly show a conflict between the regional law and global law.I somehow don't understand the reasoning behind inclusion of "Free-Software Legal Protection" in the chapter of International law vs regional law though the small section would be appropriate for the entire paper as of whole. I feel its a bit out of place.

Suggestions

 * The section on critics of free software could be better explained when emphasis is laid on the differences between "open source" and "free software". Have a look at https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html
 * There are some minor typo's and grammatical errors with respect to the sentence structure. Please have a look at them and change them appropriately.
 * Creative commons section somehow misses the connection with "web" and web documents. A small mention of how web documents like Images,text,videos are increasingly being released under one of the CC licenses and how the web has adapted to it by giving various search interfaces to help people find CC licensed documents
 * Pirate Bay trial is an important legal case on copyright and web . It would be nice to see that explained in detail with more research articles as citations . This topic also had huge media coverage so some news media sources could be added to enrich the information.
 * Web citations as a common practice come with a small description ,retrieved date and if available they also come with author and published date. Please do add them.
 * Please add more scientific literature .Check out literature on Pirate bay, "illegal" file sharing , In europe ,DMCA Take down notice