User talk:Stephen Tuck/Theory of Everything

What are your thoughts in regard to this theory and the new equation? Isn't it interesting that time, space, and matter may all be forms of kinetic energy? Isn't this an elegant solution to merging Quantum Mechanics and Einstein's General Theory of Relativity? Doesn't the conversion of mass into space solve many mysteries like Dark Energy and complete Einstein's General Theory of Rekativity? Could Science be wrong about Ether, String Theory, and have a flawed model of Quantum Mechanics? What role did philosophy of the 20th century such as Logical Positivism play in the development of Quantum Mechanics (answer not contained within this document)? Wouldn't a successful Theory of Everything define the technology of the 21st century as Einstein's work helped define the 20th century? Doesn't mankind have an inherent right to understand the universe in which we all live? Isn't the discovery of truth about the universe the most noble aspect of Science? Aren't most scientists today part of the popular movement of String Theory? What major advances has String Theory ever brought to Science? Could the God-particle called the Higgs Boson not really exist? What particle in nature has ever been scalar? Is time-travel into the past impossible? Could the government already be utilizing technology predicted by the implications of this theory? Is Wave-Particle Duality explained by the existance of an ethereal space? Could electromagnetic fields be better explained by ethereal space? Could an understanding of space allow us to unite the fundamental forces of nature? Does the Science of today uphold the great virtues that are taught in textbooks? Does the reputations of scientists, prestige, fear of reprisal, and government funding have a role in the suppression of major revolutions in Science through individual, peer-review, and news media channels? Do you understand this theory?

Another theory out suggests that the Theory of Everything expression is: AR = Ut, x, y, x = 0. 'Ut' is the primary framework of space where Time has a constant value of '0' or '1' is isometric and symmetrical across it. The 3D x,y,z is spacetime which can only exist where matter exists. e.g. Remove all the matter in the universe and what are you left with? Spacetime dissappears along with removal of it's matter. What is left is the continuous creation of New Space comprising of a single dimension where Time has a value of '0'. This has a dynamic and if that has a value of 300,000kms ( accidental value of 'C') then matter may be created from the background momentum energy and hence creation of new matter & it's unique spacetime - confined by our understanding of the Hubble Zone. Matter and spacetime may be thought of as temporary on the basis that it is totally dependant upon the conversion of energy to form it. Should the conditions of 'Ut' vary ( by modification of value 'C') then all the energy which is currently invested into matter will return to energy. The entire process may be thought of as reciprocal and 'Ut' has the ability to 'switch on' and or 'switch off' all matter. We currently exist so Ut has matter switched on. However this can change at any moment and we have no idea what the dynamics are which determine the switching frequency. If matter is switched off there will be no intelligent creatures to know that a universe ( made up of the Primary dimension Ut ). Hence the universe will not exist as there is nothing to witness it's existence in the first place. 'Absolute Relativity - Theory of Everything'.