Votian/Transdialectal morpho-phonemic writing for Votic morphology

Transdialectal morpho-phonemic writing (2009.)
I use self-made morpho-phonemic system in this project to facilitate representing morphemes  of this language, which has no oficial standard  but a lot of dialectal alternatives .

Priorities

 * 1) Each  morpheme  should have only one graphic representation.
 * 2) This goal could be easier achieved using  Chinese   logograms.
 * 3) Representation of a  morpheme  should correspond to it's  morphophonemic  qualities.
 * 4)  Obstruents in the beginning of  closed syllables  with short vowels have been weakened due to the  consonant gradation, but this is not easy to explain relying only on contemporary Votic examples, because a weak grade (of  singular inessive :  orgo-za  ('in a valley')) opposed to a strong grade (of singular nominative:  orko- ) may have preserved no visible reason of this opposition any more until we ask advise of  phonological history  and  comparative linguistics . Even though there is a slight possibility, that Votic may have had an inessive morpheme different from other  Finnic  dialects , I have marked it by  Proto-Finnic  -ssa , which clearly explains the riddle above:  orgo-za  <  * orkos-sa .
 * 5) Representation of a  morpheme  should base on it's most complete and least damaged  allomorphs  found in Votian like dialects.
 * 6) E.g. I have marked  translative  by  Proto-Finnic  -kse, because it may be pronounced either -s̄ ,   -ssi ,   -hsi  or even -sse..
 * 7) This writing system should not mark  phonetic  differences caused by  phonetic context, if we don't want to emphasize a local or individual peculiarity.
 * 8) E.g. most of Votian morphemes have a front vowel and a back vowel alternative according to  vowel harmony  (I have preferred the one without  diaeresis  and other  diacritic  marks):
 * 9) uppot+ttu >  upottu  (" drowned ")
 * 10) hüppät+ttu >  üpättü  (" jumped ")

Concordance with phonology
This writing system bases on the phonemic orthography  used in  Dictionary of Votic language by Elna Adler  and  Merle Leppik with few exceptions:
 * Letters which mark lenis   plosives  like  ʙ, ᴅ, ɢ  are represented by their  strong grade  counterparts.
 *  Stem   morphemes  are represented by their  strong grade  if the weak grade is predictable. 
 * · which marks a stressed  vowel, is usually ignored, because it has no  morphophonemic  significance.
 *  Anything written down using this morpho-phonemic system should be pronounced according to the individual ( dialectal ) background (or free choice) of a reader. 
 *  '  may mark omitted  phonemes (usually in the end of a word    ), if we want to emphasize a local or individual peculiarity . E.g. " saunast' " < " saunass " < " saunass' ", " 'p' òlĺu' 'an'í anńéttava " < " b õllu ani annõttava " < " 'B õllu ani annõttava ".
 * 1)  Grave accent  flags a letter, which in that particular  phonetic context  should not be pronounced the way as usual, if we want to emphasize a local or individual peculiarity. E.g. " ò " in " 'p' òlĺu' 'an'í anńéttava " < " b õllu ani annõttava " < " 'B õllu ani annõttava " . Nevertheless it could be pronounced as usual o according to  Kukkuzi dialect.
 * 2)  Acute accent  flags a letter, which should be pronounced the way as it's written discarding any  phonetic context, if we want to emphasize a local or individual peculiarity. E.g. " ĺ " in " 'p' òlĺu' 'an'í anńéttava " < " b õllu ani annõttava " < " 'B õllu ani annõttava " . Nevertheless we could write it: " 'p' òlǹu' 'an'í anńéttava " presuming, that the reader is familiar with Votian morphophonology. We could write it even: " epi olnut hanhe antattava " and leave readers completely free to choose how to pronounce it.
 * A buffering i, which follows a consonant stem   may be omitted, because it is required there by  phonetic context . E.g. " mer " < " mer/i ".
 * That kind of final i is represented by stem vowel e in a vowel stem  . E.g. " í " in " 'an'í " < " b õllu ani annõttava " < " 'B õllu ani annõttava " could be written: " epi olnut hanhe antattava ", because Votic (Finnic) phonotactics  requires  i  <  * e  in such a position.


 * tš has been replaced by k . (It is a regular allophone  preceding a front wovel.) E.g. " kive " < " tšivi " < " čivi ".
 * ĺ has been replaced by l etc. E.g. " päällen " < " pääĺie " < " pǟl̨ėe ".
 *  ɑ, ɑ̈  have been replaced with  a, ä .
 * õ has been replaced by the vowel, which occurs in that particular stem  in  Kukkuzi  or any closest  Finnic  dialect . I.e. it may be:
 * 1)  o  e.g. noistak ('to rise') < nõis/a.
 * 2)  a  e.g. palatak ('to burn') < põl/õa.
 * 3)  u  e.g. puippu ('chick') < põip/põ.
 * 4)  e  e.g. pelto ('field') < põl/to .   e  and  è  may stand for õ, if there is not enough knowledge to choose another option.
 * yõ has been replaced by ee. E.g. " veeras " < " vyõrɑZ " < " vė̮e̮rɑZ ".
 * y has been preserved. E.g. " gryba " < " gr ba ", " õnnõvɑd by " < " e̮nne̮vɑd  ̮ b  ".
 * χ has been replaced by hh . E.g. " hhott " < " χott " < "  ott ".
 * Ordinary lower case letters represent  voiceless vowels  as well (even in  Kukkuzi dialect) . E.g. " siällä " < " siällÄ ".
 * 1) Upper case letters do not mark beginning of a  sentence.
 * 2) Upper case letters may mark  proper names  and  toponyms   e.g.  Kattila-lla on kaks külan ottsata  <  k a t t i л a - ллa on kahs tšülǟ  e̮ttsā  ('There are two (village-) ends in Kattila.')
 * 3) Upper case letters may mark components of a  compound morpheme  (the first one excluded) like in  Zulu language  (Zulu: isiZulu)  e.g.  akkunAlla ~ akkun'Al'la  <   * akkunalu'sella  <   * akkuna(n) aluksella  ('in the courtyard')
 * 4) Morphemes may be separated by   hyphen  too, like in  Hakka language  (Hakka: Hak-kâ-fa) e.g.  akkun-alla ~ akkun'-al'la  <   * akkunalu'sella  <   * akkuna(n) aluksella  ('in the courtyard')