Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/archive

Archived at: 20070520023211

[ Purge] Demonstration This revision=20070519162600 [ Purge] &#123;&#123;subst:wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/preload}} &#123;&#123;subst:&#123;&#123;subst:NAMESPACE}}:&#123;&#123;subst:BASEPAGENAME}}|subst=subst:}} --Hillgentleman|Talk 16:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Argument: To start a thread, go to a page in a namespace with subpage function, and enter
 * To archive a thread, go to the subpage /archive of the thread, and
 * To reply, press the external link "reply".
 * To edit an existing (sub)thread, press "Edit" next to the section header.
 * reply[]

Questions? Comments?
NavHead This revision=20070519163246
 * Argument:

--Hillgentleman|Talk 16:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * reply[]

Testing the "external link"
Testing thread This revision=20070519101448
 * Argument:I'm guessing that my comment goes here.

--JWSchmidt 17:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Re-introducing the thread This revision=20070519181349
 * Argument: adding a thread to a deadend.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * reply to ":I'm guessing that my comment goes here" []

A one-liner may go here.
NavHead This revision=20070519182021 Here we can elaborate! --Hillgentleman|Talk 18:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Argument: The script is becoming too small.
 * reply[]

Perhaps I should change "argument" to "comment".
NavHead This revision=20070519182319 --Hillgentleman|Talk 18:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Argument: But I still like argument!
 * reply[]

Done Argument -->comment. :/preload
NavHead This revision=20070519182832 --Hillgentleman|Talk 18:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment:
 * reply[]

Testing sections
Can there be sections within threads? --JWSchmidt 17:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * reply[]

A one liner may go here.
NavHead This revision=20070519172843 --Hillgentleman|Talk 17:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Argument: Here we can elaborate....
 * reply[]

Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose.
NavHead This revision=20070519173345 Originally I tried REVISIONID, which didn't work: if we substitute a revisionid, we get blank. --Hillgentleman|Talk 17:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Argument: BASEPAGENAME/1/1/1/1/1... can only produce a linear structure.
 * reply[]

And try not to create your own section.
NavHead This revision=20070519173646 --Hillgentleman|Talk 17:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Argument: Use the "reply link" to create a new section, or else you would create a dead end.
 * reply[]

I mean,
NavHead This revision=20070519174254 My "A one-liner may go here" is a reply to ":I'm guessing that my comment goes here." and "Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose." replies "Can there be sections within treads". But that latter section was created articficailly (without pressing the "reply button") and so it hijacked the reply link to the previous comment. Or we can say, two different comments (and two different replies) were merged. That makes the questions and answers crossed. So it is a little confusing.
 * Argument:

In short, Don't create your own section. Use the "reply" link. Once you have created a section, you are free to edit your previous comments, correct mistakes, etc.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * reply[]

IF you find this text too small
NavHead This revision=20070519174550 go to a subthread by pressing the edit button.
 * Argument:

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * reply[]

Problem fixed by reintroducing a thread
NavHead This revision=20070519183132 --Hillgentleman|Talk 18:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: See above.
 * reply[]

Using the edit "button" for the new section that I started with the "external link" reply "button". --JWSchmidt 17:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

It is better to use the "edit" button only for correcting mistakes.
NavHead This revision=20070519173026
 * Argument: To state a new point, use the "Reply" link, or else your comment would be a dead end.

--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * reply[]