Wikiversity talk:Community Review/Problematic actions/Policy development

In an attempt to come to terms with the wikiversity’s structure, policy and management I found my way to http://meatballwiki.org/wiki now defunct. In an attempt to clarify my thoughts I did a quick review of ‘learning styles’ on Google. Then referred to the same search on Wikipedia. Try it yourself: Google provides images at the top of the list while I’m sad to say one cannot find any illustration graph or diagram on Wiki. TEXT ONLY PLEASE - whatever, here is the comment I would have made.

Because I'm 69 years old and dyslexic, I am essentially an autodidact. I suppose this qualifies me to evaluate the comments viewed here. I see the full range potential of learning styles contributing [that's good] but with little regard for comments provided from the other learning sectors. Wikiversity is primarily text based for now. That's alright for the first decade of this century, however when what you're having for this evening's dinner is more readily explained with a phone photo [I assume there's a proper expression for that] then all learning types must come to recognize and accommodate each other, and that's the beauty of graphic user interface: everyone finds his/her own way to the common destination. Our learning circle forms there but only with all view points involved can we, as a group, comprehend the subject Jarrokam 19-02-2016