Wikiversity talk:Examples

This page is likely to get quite unwieldy, especially if we include every subject area. My main rationale for doing this, however, is to show the various types of content we are developing (ie videos, interactive games, various activities etc.), rather than by subject/discipline. As subject areas begin to expand we may find a better way of displaying them - it might be better off in Featured, for example (in fact, maybe this page should be merged with that one - what do you think?) Cormaggio 21:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I think it's alright. For a page like this, we need not plan too far ahead. As an aside, are we all "Wiklars" here? What did we decide on our identity? --HappyCamper 11:03, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * "Wiklar" is Mirwin's preference, but I don't think anyone else has used it. "Wikischolar" (of which "Wiklar" is an abbreviation) seemed to be the best received proposal at the time. Personally, I still use "Wikiversity participants" (unwieldy as it may be). Looks like there's still a gap in the neologism market... Cormaggio 11:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Thinking alike
I spent three months working on pages like Featured and Help:resource types without ever finding out that an initiative had already been taken in the same direction such a long time ago! well, structural reform.... --McCormack 08:06, 15 August 2008 (UTC)