Wikiversity talk:Quality

Priming the pump
This is a test of an extremely simple precursor for Assessment conducted as part of the Learning to learn a wiki way project. It's worthless and unknown at this time, but it may evolve into something important as Quality becomes an item.

A quality0 template series (, ... ) could be expanded to include different types of assesments (Alignment, Participation, Collaboration...). A template/bot system could be automated for computing daily, weekly, monthly and yearly cumulative averages via simple numeric assessment tid-bits entered by custodial staff, experts, users – registered and anonymous. It could be outfitted with pipes and variables for assessment of Schools, Portals, Topics and what-not.

Quality Assessment, in my view, should be a top priority. The most logical way to do this, I reckon, is from the general to the specific (0..n). It must be quick and easy (wiki wiki) – painless, transparent, automated, succinct.... (Bots). It would need to interact with all or, at least key pages to be meaningful.

The MediaWiki Project and Topic:MediaWiki might even work on getting it into the toolbox with a context-sensitive embedded input, if we get a hand from those devs and gurus over at mediawiki.org. (throw us a bone, guys!). Please PAR-lay at Talk:Learning to learn a wiki way or, better still here to raise the context of this discussion. CQ 01:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

which number is the best?
Well, when I read the article, I wonder if the numbers are equal on every country. E.g. I wonder, if 1 or 10 is the best grade. Can you enlighten me? Also state it in the article please. Erkan Yilmaz (evaluate me!, discussion ) 17:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Usually the scale is from 1 = poor to 10 = very good.--mikeu 18:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

0.02

 * Why only one comment per month?
 * Minor point, but I think people should use an asterisk rather than a hash to bullet-point their opinions - the numbered bullet points interfere with the reading of the numbers.
 * And no, in case you're wondering, the heading is not my rating. ;-) Cormaggio talk 16:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

June 2008: Board elections/2008/Candidates/Questions/3
not a number, but surely also helpful, Erkan Yilmaz uses the Chat (try) 19:24, 2 August 2008 (UTC)