Wikiversity talk:Statements of opinion regarding consensus

I do not understand the reason for having a page that makes a distinction between "statements of opinion regarding consensus" and having "a spot for discussion". Discussion is normally an important part of establishing consensus. A serious danger in the process of establishing consensus is that a few editors can claim that consensus exists and then that claim is never again examined. Is the intent of this page to provide a place where past claims of consensus can be challenged and brought to the attention of the community? --JWSchmidt 07:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I was hoping we could another place, but maybe without all the unfair skewering and accusations and arguing. We could maybe come up with a better name though. Emesee 06:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I will start one.... and we can see if this process is worth keeping, or worth scrapping...

Use of this?
What's really the whole point of this? Can't we just do this in our userspace/where these comments are needed to be? ---Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 02:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)