Wikiversity talk:Username

We should tailor an appropriate version of Wikipedia's User Name policy immediately and place it here for further modification, review, and ratification.

Votes

 * Mirwin 12:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * digital_metalk 01:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Rayc 05:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Robert Horning 05:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * but fix the page. Messedrocker 18:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * -- sebmol ? 12:12, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Doesn't need to be a policy.
 * --Dario vet 12:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * TimNelson 13:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC) ...but dones't it need a until it's approved?
 * Yorktown1776 15:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Its a good username policy.--Sir James Paul 05:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ready for guideline now CQ 13:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Not even ready to be a guideline. -- dark lama  16:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Comments

 * There is a lot of distilled practical wisdom in Wikipedia's user name policy developed over a period of years. Our user name issues are likely to be almost identical, at least I cannot think of any major deviations from Wikipedia's environment and needs.  By adopting this early we can avoid a few problems, it can always be tweaked in the wiki way when needed. Mirwin 12:34, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Those all looks to me like common sense so IMO it doesn't need to be written down as a policy. I'd like to keep our policies to a minimum if we really want people to actually read and follow them. -- sebmol ? 13:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

) Looks like all the main points have been covered. A few more tweaks and it should be ready. Yorktown1776 15:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, some heated discussion in Wikipedia were about names, if I remember right. A policy like this would more helpful than it would add to "instruction creep". Awolf002 00:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Until I actually see the page, I can't say yes or no on it. --Rayc 05:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I am neutral really to this policy in general, but I think it is a bit premature here on Wikiversity. Other than some blatant vandals with obscene language in their names and impersonating well known users, I don't see this as a problem.  Besides, with the unified login coming I don't see even that becoming a major issue as the naming conventions are going to be moved up to the foundation level as well.  I would suggest holding off for just a little bit longer and see what happens over the next couple of months if this is needed.  --Robert Horning 05:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree, this is something we don't need at the moment. --HappyCamper 11:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Names with non-Latin characters
I suggest that we allow all characters, but ask the users to transliterate their names in their signatures.--Hillgentleman|User talk 17:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Adopt as Guideline
I'm going to put Guideline on here now. Any objections? ..tic.tic.tic.. CQ 13:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * . The Jade Knight (d'viser) 16:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Except I still oppose this section: "Names with non-Latin characters".  The Jade Knight (d'viser) 16:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * ✅. Removed that section, it's truly out of place with SUL. --Abd (discuss • contribs) 19:27, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Offensive user names
I started here the discussion about user name policy and how to identify offensive user names?

"Wikimedia foundation" Wikis discussion pages about user name policy.
"Wikimedia foundation" runs nearly 250 wiki platforms. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Using_Wikibooks/Setting_Up_A_User_Account#Choosing_a_Username

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikiquote:Username_policy

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Username

(KOItopet (discuss • contribs) 03:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC))


 * See Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Username policy for guidelines on usernames, and specifically Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Username policy for how to handle them. If you'd like to discuss this further, please use the Colloquium. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 12:53, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanq User:Dave Braunschweig, i was added other usefull information:

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Username#Inappropriate_usernames

"The below information from your website : https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Username.

Confusing, misleading, or troublesome usernames
Names that can be confused with other contributors. (If someone else is using a nickname that you wish to use, please consider using either an alternative pseudonym or your real name instead, or simply do not use a nickname. In the unlikely event that someone else is editing Wikiversity with your real name, please add a middle name or initial or some other way of distinguishing between you and the existing contributor) Names that include commonly used Wikimedia software or Wikiversity community terms, or imply an official position on Wikiversity. Prohibited username components include, but are not limited to words resembling the following: "Custodian","Administrator", "Admin", "System operator", "Sysop", "Moderator", or any other name which implies an official role or role greater than that of a standard user. "Rollback" or "Revert", "Edit war", "POV", etc.       "Delete", "Upload", "Pagemove", "Redirect", or other editing processes or abstractions "Vandal", "Hacker", "Spammer", "Troll", or other names that may give the impression that you intend to cause trouble "Bot", "Robot", "Script", "Initialize", "Automated", "Daemon", etc., unless the name is intended as a designated bot account. Names that imply bot accounts may be blocked, and the user may be requested to contact an administrator to confirm that the account is indeed a bot account. Any visible toolbar buttons, namespaces, or other technical terms which may be confusing to inexperienced users or otherwise imply a capacity different than that of a normal user.

Inflammatory usernames
Wikiversity does not allow potentially inflammatory or offensive user names. Inflammatory usernames are needlessly discouraging to other contributors, and disrupt and distract from our task of creating an effective learning environment. This includes, but is not limited to:

Names that promote or imply hatred or violence, Names that are recognized as slurs or insults,Names that refer to symbols of hatred, including historical figures or events that are widely associated with such,Names that refer to or imply sexual acts or genitalia, including slang, innuendo, and double entendre, Names that refer to or allude to reproductive or excretory functions of the body,Names that promote or refer to violent or otherwise illegal real-world actions (e.g terrorism, organized crime),Names mentioning or referring to illnesses, disabilities, or conditions (e.g. AIDS, Amputation, Asperger syndrome, etc.) Names that contain profanity, obscenities, or other potentially offensive language (including non-English profanities),Inappropriate usernames : Names of religious figures such as "God","Jehovah",,"Buddha","Bonadea" or "Allah","Jainism","Islam","Hinduism" or any other religious user names are prohibited in Wikiversity. Names that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view,Misspellings, or spellings of any of the types of names above with "cr34+1v3 sub5717u710nz" (creative substitutions)

Title_blacklist
This is a list of page titles which are blocked from creation/editing on Wikimedia wikis.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Title_blacklist

Thanq ,Please reply me, ...I gathered all information for easy reference  from your website and your mentioned above websites.

(KOItopet (discuss • contribs) 16:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC))


 * Thank you for sharing this information. If there seems to be something missing from the page, please be bold and update it. If you're asking for someone to do something in response to inappropriate usernames, see Request custodian action. Thanks! -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 17:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

WV:UNC needs updates
The current version of WV:UNC says that Bureaucrats will rename, but this is outdated (renaming is currently handled by stewards and global renamers), how should we update this section? Should we simply replace Bureaucrats to stewards and global renamers, or do we need further rewriting? MathXplore (discuss • contribs) 02:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)


 * To be perfectly honest, I think most, if not all, of this section is unnecessary. The vast majority of inappropriate usernames are vandalism-only accounts, and are blocked as a matter of course. It is exceptionally rare that a productive contributor will have an inappropriate username; on the off-chance that one shows up, they can be directed to request a rename through Special:GlobalRenameRequest. Omphalographer (discuss • contribs) 03:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The steward change is uncontroversial, so I already did it: keeping outdated directives is just going to cause problems. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)