Wikiversity talk:What shall we do with Wikipedia?

"Traffic driving"
This article should avoid references to phrases like "traffic driving", which suggests a one-sided exploitation. The general idea is that Wikipedia has specific problems in specific areas, usually created by the limited scope of its mission, where Wikiversity can step in to alleviate the problem in a more constructive manner than is currently the case - e.g. transwiki material rather than deleting it. --McCormack 04:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Original Research
While I think it's a great idea to salvage good OR from deletion on WP, we did have a long discussion a while back on what kind of OR would be allowed at WV. I also have to say that there is some pages that are tagged OR because of facts or formulations that aren't supported by the requisite number of third party sources.

I think trying to find a synergy between wikis is great -- we should think a bit about involving other small wikis too, so that we are really creating a web of useful information and links. Historybuff 20:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. I'm quite sure that a lot of the tagged materials on WP wouldn't be suitable here. But even if only 10% are worth rescuing, that's hundreds of resources at least. --McCormack 20:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It's a great idea to use the Original research from Wikipedia as it is a lot of useful knowledge down the drain otherwise. It is certainly true that stronger links must be developed with Wikipedia. Bonzostar 00:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)